Guidelines for in vivo mouse models of myocardial infarction

Author:

Lindsey Merry L.12ORCID,Brunt Keith R.3ORCID,Kirk Jonathan A.4ORCID,Kleinbongard Petra5ORCID,Calvert John W.67,de Castro Brás Lisandra E.8,DeLeon-Pennell Kristine Y.910ORCID,Del Re Dominic P.11,Frangogiannis Nikolaos G.12,Frantz Stefan13,Gumina Richard J.141516ORCID,Halade Ganesh V.17ORCID,Jones Steven P.18ORCID,Ritchie Rebecca H.19ORCID,Spinale Francis G.20ORCID,Thorp Edward B.21,Ripplinger Crystal M.22ORCID,Kassiri Zamaneh23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, Center for Heart and Vascular Research, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska

2. Research Service, Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, Nebraska

3. Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada

4. Department of Cell and Molecular Physiology, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

5. Institute for Pathophysiology, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Essen Medical School, Essen, Germany

6. Carlyle Fraser Heart Center of Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia

7. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia

8. Department of Physiology, The Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina

9. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina

10. Research Service, Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina

11. Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey

12. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The Wilf Family Cardiovascular Research Institute, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York

13. Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

14. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio

15. Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio

16. The Dorothy M. Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio

17. Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida

18. Department of Medicine, Diabetes and Obesity Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky

19. Drug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University (Parkville Campus), Victoria, Australia

20. Cardiovascular Translational Research Center, University of South Carolina School of Medicine and the Columbia Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Columbia, South Carolina

21. Department of Pathology and Feinberg Cardiovascular and Renal Research Institute, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois

22. Department of Pharmacology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis, California

23. Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Abstract

Despite significant improvements in reperfusion strategies, acute coronary syndromes all too often culminate in a myocardial infarction (MI). The consequent MI can, in turn, lead to remodeling of the left ventricle (LV), the development of LV dysfunction, and ultimately progression to heart failure (HF). Accordingly, an improved understanding of the underlying mechanisms of MI remodeling and progression to HF is necessary. One common approach to examine MI pathology is with murine models that recapitulate components of the clinical context of acute coronary syndrome and subsequent MI. We evaluated the different approaches used to produce MI in mouse models and identified opportunities to consolidate methods, recognizing that reperfused and nonreperfused MI yield different responses. The overall goal in compiling this consensus statement is to unify best practices regarding mouse MI models to improve interpretation and allow comparative examination across studies and laboratories. These guidelines will help to establish rigor and reproducibility and provide increased potential for clinical translation.

Funder

HHS | National Institutes of Health

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Publisher

American Physiological Society

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Physiology

Cited by 51 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3