Affiliation:
1. Water Research Institute , Nábr. arm. gen. L. Svobodu 5, 812 49 Bratislava , Slovak Republic ;
Abstract
Abstract
The primary aim of the article is to obtain an overview of benefits from the actual use of inland water ecosystem services (ESSs) in Slovakia. The evaluation, which includes both surface water and groundwater, is primarily focused on demand side. Methods for assessing the benefits of the most prevalent ESSs, designated by Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES classification) v. 4.3, are described and discussed. The evaluation is performed at the level of 10 sub-basins to which available data are allocated. In the absence of necessary data or the impossibility of allocating them to sub-basins, the benefit from the use of some ESSs is estimated at the level of whole Slovak territory. The use of ESSs valuation in practice, especially with regard to water protection of surface water and groundwater, is discussed. The evaluation of benefits from ESSs of inland waters in Slovakia so far does not allow direct use of obtained results for proposal of measures within river basin management plans as suggested by several authors. Main reason is the input data availability and quality. At the present time, the significance of the ESSs evaluation may rather lie in the awareness of the value that human society gains from the use of inland waters. It becomes more evident that increase in environmental awareness alone is not sufficient in terms of the protection of ecosystems and their services. To achieve unambiguous and lasting improvement in this area, it is necessary to address the deeper causes, closely related to human thinking and behaviour.
Reference49 articles.
1. Austin, D., Cerman, G., Heywood, T., Marshall, R., Refling, K. & Van Patter L. (2012). Valuing natural capital and ecosystem services. Ontario: University of Guelph.
2. Bechtel, R.B. & Churchman A. (Eds.) (2002). Handbook of environmental psychology. New York: J. Wiley & Sons, Inc.
3. Boyd, J. & Banzhaf S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63, 616–626. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002
4. Brouwer, R. (2004). The concept of environmental and resource costs. Lessons learned from ECO2. In R. Brouwer & P. Strosser (Eds.), Environmental and resource costs and the Water Framework Directive. An overview of European practices (pp. 3−12). Workshop Proc. RIZA, Lelystad.
5. Brouwer, R. (2008). The potential role of stated preference methods in the water framework directive to assess disproportionate costs. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(5), 597–614. DOI: 10.1080/09640560802207860.10.1080/09640560802207860
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献