Affiliation:
1. Thai Nguyen University of Education, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports , Vietnam
2. Dong Hy High School , Thai Nguyen Province , Vietnam
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction.
Collaborative Learning (CL) is a group learning method that involves mutual support and assistance among individual students to achieve learning goals. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a 14-week Physical Education (PE) class using the CL method in enhancing the physical development of 11th-grade students.
Material and Methods.
Eighty healthy students were randomly selected and divided into two groups: the experimental group with 40 students applying the CL method in PE classes, and the control group with 40 students studying PE using conventional methods. In this study, five fitness tests were used such as a 30-s sit-up test, a 30-m sprint test, a 4 × 10-m shuttle run test, a standing long jump test, and a 5-min running field test.
Results.
After 14 weeks of experimentation, independent t-test results indicated a significant difference in the mean values between the experimental and control groups at the threshold of p < 0.05. Paired t-test results for the mean values before and after the experiment in both groups also showed a difference, with the physical fitness growth rate of the experimental group being higher than that of the control group. Particularly, the control group exhibited a post-experiment value that had a negative significance.
Conclusions.
This demonstrates that the experimental results serve as an illustration, confirming the effectiveness of the CL method in high school PE classes. Teachers should enhance the use of CL in the future to achieve higher learning goals.
Reference38 articles.
1. Slavin R.E. (2014). Cooperative learning and academic achievement: Why does groupwork work? Anales de Psicología 30(3), 785-791. DOI: 10.6018/analesps.30.3.201201
2. Laal M., Ghodsi S.M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 31, 486-490. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091
3. Abramczyk A., Jurkowski S. (2020). Cooperative learning as an evidence-based teaching strategy: what teachers know, believe, and how they use it. Journal of Education for Teaching 46(3), 296-308. DOI: 10.1080/02607476.2020.1733402
4. Kyndt E., Raes E., Lismont B., Timmers F., Cascallar E., Dochy F. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educational Research Review 10, 133-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002
5. Kırık Ö.T., Boz Y. (2010). Effect of cooperative learning on students. Understanding of reaction rate. In S. Dolinšek, T. Lyons (eds), Socio-cultural and human values in science and technology education (pp. 1119-1127). XIV IOSTE Symposium, Bled, Slovenia.