Media portrayal of panic buying: A content analysis of online news portals

Author:

Yasir Arafat S.M.1,Kar Sujita Kumar2,Menon Vikas3,Marthoenis Marthoenis4,Sharma Pawan5,Alradie-Mohamed Angi6,Mukherjee Srijeeta7,Kaliamoorthy Charanya3,Kabir Russell6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry , Enam Medical College and Hospital , Dhaka - , Bangladesh

2. Department of Psychiatry , King George's Medical University , Lucknow - , U.P. , India

3. Department of Psychiatry , Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER) , Puducherry - , India .

4. Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health Nursing , Universitas Syiah Kuala , Banda Aceh , Indonesia

5. Department of Psychiatry , School of Medicine, Patan Academy of Health Sciences , Lalitpur , Nepal

6. School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine, and Social Care , Anglia Ruskin University , Chelmsford , United Kingdom

7. Department of Psychiatry , MKCG Medical College , Brahmapur , Odisha - , India .

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Media reporting has an influential role in panic buying (PB). We aimed to evaluate the media portrayal of PB during this COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We searched, collected, and analysed the news reports from the English media discussing the PB events. The search was done between 23 and 30 May 2020. Results A total of 525 news reports were analysed. Approximately half (49.3%) discussed the government action to handle the situation, 36.4% discussed the expert opinion regarding PB, 20.6% discussed the psychology of PB, 21.5% discussed the rumours, and 18.5% suggested remedial measures. Concerning the negative aspects, 96.6% of the titles mentioned panic buying, 75.4% mentioned the cause, and 62.3% mentioned the photos of empty shelves. The media in low–middle-income countries are 1.5 times more likely to include expert opinion (p = 0.03), 2.1 times more likely to discuss rumours regarding PB (p = 0.001), almost thrice more likely to report the cause of PB (p = 0.001), and thrice more likely to mention its impact (p = 0.001). Conclusion Media has been portraying more negative aspects of PB. Further, there are variations in reporting patterns between high-income and low–middle-income countries.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3