Patient Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS): Methodological Considerations of a Field Trial in Slovenia

Author:

AMBROŽ Matija1ORCID,KENDIR Candan23ORCID,BOERMA Wienke4ORCID,KLEMENC-KETIŠ Zalika156ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1 Community Health Centre Ljubljana , Metelkova 9 , Ljubljana , Slovenia

2. 2 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) , 2, rue André Pascal Paris , France

3. 3 Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health , Amsterdam , Netherlands

4. 4 NIVEL Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research , Otterstraat 118 , Utrecht , The Netherlands

5. 5 University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine , Taborska 8 , Maribor , Slovenia

6. 6 University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine , Poljanski nasip 58 , Ljubljana , Slovenia

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Healthcare systems collect little information about the experiences and outcomes of care from the perspectives of patients. Patient Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) is an OECD initiative to measure the outcomes and experiences of people living with chronic conditions, who are managed in primary care. Objectives To evaluate the feasibility of the methodology employed in the Field Trial of the PaRIS survey in Slovenia and propose adjustments to enhance sampling in the Main Survey. Methods In 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional observational study in 50 family medicine practices in Slovenia with a target of recruiting 70 patients per practice. We used the Slovenian version of the PaRIS questionnaires, and evaluated sampling and data collection. Results The sample contained 21 providers (42.0% response rate) and 454 patients (50.7% response rate). The provider sample did not differ from the population characteristics, while the patient sample differed significantly from the patient population. All providers completed the survey online, in 20.9±11.1 minutes and had 1.5±1.5 restarts. Most patients (74.9%) completed the survey online and needed 36.0±22.6 minutes, and the mean number of restarts was 1.4±2.2. Conclusion Based on the results, we recommend conducting a methodology test for quality assessment studies before initiating the main survey. Legal issues should be addressed and considered early when developing the methodology. It is also necessary to be aware of the feasibility of the study in practice, to avoid a low participation rate.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3