Prediction of the Difficult Laryngoscopy with Ultrasound Measurements of Hyomental Distance

Author:

Glāzniece-Kagane Zane1,Bērziņš Arvīds12,Kagans Aleksandrs1,Grigorjevs Sergejs1,Ozoliņa Agnese12,Mamaja Biruta12

Affiliation:

1. Clinic of Anaesthesiology , Rīga East Clinical University Hospital , 2 Hipokrāta Str ., Rīga , , Latvia

2. Faculty of Medicine , Rīga Stradiņš University , 16 Dzirciema Str ., Rīga , , Latvia

Abstract

Abstract Ultrasound measurement of hyomental distance is promising as a predictor for difficult laryngoscopy in cases of difficult airway management. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic value of ultrasound measurement of hyomental distance (HMD) for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy. Hyomental distance was sonographically measured in neutral (HMDn) and extreme head extension (HMDe) positions for fifty-six patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation. Then the hyomental distance ratio (HMDR) was calculated. According to presence of difficult laryngoscopy assessed by the Cormack–Lehane (CL) score, patients were divided into a difficult laryngoscopy group (DL, n = 15) and easy laryngoscopy group (EL, n = 41). We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of HMDn, HMDe, and HMDR for difficult laryngoscopy. DL was present in 15 (27%) patients. We found a significant intergroup difference in HMDR between the DL and EL groups (1.12 ± 0.04 vs. 1.24 ± 0.06, respectively; p < 0.001). In contrast, we were not able to find a significant difference for HMDn and HMDr. HMDR had the highest sensitivity 86.7% and specificity 85.4% (p < 0.01) to predict difficult laryngoscopy, where the area under the curve was 0.939; p < 0.01 for HDMR < 1.2 cm. Moreover, we found that difficult laryngoscopy was associated with higher body mass index (BMI), with higher values in the DL group compared to EL patients (34.3 ± 9.1 vs. 28.5 ± 5.7 kg/m2, respectively; p = 0.035). HMDR < 1.2 cm measured by ultrasound might have a good predictive value for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3