Agents of different origins for reduction of mycotoxins’ level in feed
Author:
Bočarov-Stančić Aleksandra1, Lopičić Zorica2, Krstović Saša3, Krulj Jelena4, Milojković Jelena2, Maslovarić Marijana1, Bodroža-Solarov Marija4
Affiliation:
1. 1 Institute for Science Application in Agriculture , Bul. despota Stefana 68b, 11000 Belgrade , Serbia 2. 2 Institute for Technology of Nuclear and Other Mineral Raw Materials , Bul. Franše d’Eperea 86, 11000 Belgrade , Serbia 3. 3 Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science , University of Novi Sad , Trg Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21000 Novi Sad , Serbia 4. 4 Institute of Food Technology , University of Novi Sad , Bul. cara Lazara 1, 21000 Novi Sad , Serbia
Abstract
Abstract
Toxic secondary metabolites of some fungi (mainly representatives of Alternaria, Aspergillus, Fusarium and Penicillium genera) may contaminate agricultural products, representing serious health hazards both to humans and animals. Along with this, the economic losses due to the mycotoxins’ presence in feed production, including crop and animal feedstuff processing and distribution, motivated the plentiful research of detoxification strategies. Feed supplementation with mineral adsorbents (zeolites, hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate (HSCAS), bentonites, etc.) is the most prominent approach widely applied. Besides these, other products for mycotoxin level reduction based on the constituents of the yeast cell wall or Lactobacilli are often used. Recently, many investigations are directed toward plant-derived products that can efficiently adsorb mycotoxins in their native (biosorbents) or modified forms (e.g. activated carbon, biochar etc.). These renewable, easily accessible and readily prepared sorbents are economically viable and safe alternatives for mycotoxin decontamination of feed resources. Organic polymers (chitosan, cellulose, etc.) as well as synthetic polymers, such as polyvinyl pyrrolidine, also might reduce mycotoxins’ level in feed. Besides these conventional methods, new research trends are nanotechnologies, the promising, effective, low-cost way for mycotoxins’ removal. This overview systematically summarizes information on binding agents of different origins for the reduction of mycotoxins’ levels in feed. Furthermore, the knowledge of potential applications of binding agents in the feed industry is also reviewed and discussed.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference156 articles.
1. Abbas Z., Blank R., Wein S., Wolffram S. (2013). Effect of quercetin on the toxicokinetics of ochratoxin A in rats. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo Risk Assess., 30: 861–866. 2. Abdel-Wahhab M.A., Aljawish A., El-Nekeety A.A., Abdel-Aziem S.H., Hassan N.S. (2017). Chitosan nanoparticles plus quercetin suppress the oxidative stress, modulate DNA fragmentation and gene expression in the kidney of rats fed ochratoxin A-contaminated diet. Food Chem. Toxicol., 99: 209–221. 3. Adamović M., Stojanović M., Lopičić Z., Milojković J., Lačnjevac Č., Petrović J., Bočarov-Stančić A. (2013). Biosorpcija mikotoksina otpadnom biomasom. Zaštita materijala (in Serbian), 54: 327–333. 4. Adunphatcharaphon S., Petchkongkaew A., Greco D., D’Ascanio V., Visessanguan W., Avantaggiato G. (2020). The effectiveness of durian peel as multi-mycotoxin adsorbent. Toxins, 12: 108. 5. Ahmadou A., Napoli A., Durand N., Montet D. (2019). High physical properties of cashew nut shell biochars in the adsorption of mycotoxins. Int. J. Food Res., 6: 1828.
|
|