Should Noncurative Resection of the Primary Tumour Be Performed in Patients with Stage iv Colorectal Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Ahmed S.,Shahid R.K.,Leis A.,Haider K.,Kanthan S.,Reeder B.,Pahwa P.

Abstract

Purpose: Surgical resection of the primary tumour in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial. This review compares survival in patients with advanced crc who underwent surgical resection of the primary tumour with that in patients not undergoing resection, and determines rates of post-operative mortality and nonfatal complications, the primary tumour complication rate, the non-resection surgical procedures rate, and quality of life (QOL). Methods: Reports in the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases were searched for relevant studies, which were selected using pre-specified eligibility criteria. The search was also restricted to publication dates from 1980 onward, the English language, and studies involving human subjects. Screening, evaluation of relevant articles, and data abstraction were performed in duplicate, and agreement between the abstractors was assessed. Articles that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for quality using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Data were collected and synthesized per protocol. Results: From among the 3379 reports located, fifteen retrospective observational studies were selected. Of the 12,416 patients in the selected studies, 8620 (69%) underwent surgery. Median survival was 15.2 months (range: 10–30.7 months) in the resection group and 11.4 months (range: 3–22 months) in the non-resection group. Hazard ratio for survival was 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61 to 0.79] favouring surgical resection. Mean rates of postoperative mortality and nonfatal complications were 4.9% (95% CI: 0% to 9.7%) and 25.9% (95% CI: 20.1% to 31.6%) respectively. The mean primary tumour complication rate was 29.7% (95% CI: 18.5% to 41.0%), and the non-resection surgical procedures rate in the non-resection group was 27.6% (95 CI: 15.4% to 39.9%). No study provided QOL data. Conclusions: Although this review supports primary tumour resection in advanced CRC, the results have significant biases. Randomized trials are warranted to confirm the findings.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3