Social determinants of health and US cancer screening interventions: A systematic review

Author:

Korn Ariella R.12ORCID,Walsh‐Bailey Callie3,Correa‐Mendez Margarita1,DelNero Peter4,Pilar Meagan5,Sandler Brittney6,Brownson Ross C.37,Emmons Karen M.8,Oh April Y.9

Affiliation:

1. Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program Implementation Science Team Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences National Cancer Institute Rockville Maryland USA

2. Behavioral and Policy Sciences Department RAND Corporation Boston Massachusetts USA

3. Prevention Research Center Brown School at Washington University in St Louis St Louis Missouri USA

4. College of Medicine University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock Arkansas USA

5. Division of Infectious Diseases Washington University School of Medicine St Louis Missouri USA

6. Bernard Becker Medical Library Washington University School of Medicine St Louis Missouri USA

7. Department of Surgery Division of Public Health Sciences and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center Washington University School of Medicine Washington University in St Louis St Louis Missouri USA

8. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts USA

9. Implementation Science Team, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences National Cancer Institute Rockville Maryland USA

Abstract

AbstractThere remains a need to synthesize linkages between social determinants of health (SDOH) and cancer screening to reduce persistent inequities contributing to the US cancer burden. The authors conducted a systematic review of US‐based breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung cancer screening intervention studies to summarize how SDOH have been considered in interventions and relationships between SDOH and screening. Five databases were searched for peer‐reviewed research articles published in English between 2010 and 2021. The Covidence software platform was used to screen articles and extract data using a standardized template. Data items included study and intervention characteristics, SDOH intervention components and measures, and screening outcomes. The findings were summarized using descriptive statistics and narratives. The review included 144 studies among diverse population groups. SDOH interventions increased screening rates overall by a median of 8.4 percentage points (interquartile interval, 1.8–18.8 percentage points). The objective of most interventions was to increase community demand (90.3%) and access (84.0%) to screening. SDOH interventions related to health care access and quality were most prevalent (227 unique intervention components). Other SDOH, including educational, social/community, environmental, and economic factors, were less common (90, 52, 21, and zero intervention components, respectively). Studies that included analyses of health policy, access to care, and lower costs yielded the largest proportions of favorable associations with screening outcomes. SDOH were predominantly measured at the individual level. This review describes how SDOH have been considered in the design and evaluation of cancer screening interventions and effect sizes for SDOH interventions. Findings may guide future intervention and implementation research aiming to reduce US screening inequities.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Oncology,Hematology

Reference184 articles.

1. American Association for Cancer Research (AACR).AACR Cancer Disparities Progress Report. AACR;2022. Accessed September 30 2022.http://www.cancerdisparitiesprogressreport.org/

2. Cancer Screening Prevalence and Associated Factors Among US Adults

3. Cancer screening in the United States, 2019: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening

4. US Preventive Services Task Force. Cancer Recommendations. Accessed April 4 2023.https://uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/topic_search_results?category%5B%5D=15&searchterm=

5. Community Preventive Services Task Force. Cancer. Accessed April 4 2023.https://www.thecommunityguide.org/topics/cancer.html

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3