Practice Patterns of Central Venous Catheter Placement and Confirmation in Pediatric Critical Care

Author:

Veten Ahmed1ORCID,Davis Joshua2ORCID,Kavanagh Robert3ORCID,Thomas Neal4ORCID,Zurca Adrian5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatric Critical Care, at Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

2. Department of Emergency Medicine Resident at Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

3. Department of Pediatrics & Critical Care Medicine at Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

4. Department of Pediatrics and Public Health Sciences, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

5. Department of Pediatric Critical Care, Pediatrics at Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Abstract

AbstractOptimal practices for the placement of central venous catheters (CVCs) in critically ill children are unclear. This study describes the clinical practice of pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM) providers regarding CVC placement, including site selection, confirmation practices and assessment of complications. Two-hundred fourteen PCCM providers responded to an electronic survey, including 170 (79%) attending physicians, 30 (14%) fellow physicians, and 14 (7%) advanced practice providers. PCCM providers most commonly place internal jugular (IJ) and femoral CVCs, with subclavian CVCs and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) placed less commonly (IJ 99%, femoral 95%, subclavian 40%, PICC 19%). The IJ is the most preferred site (128/214 (60%)); decreased infection risk is the most common reason for preferring this site. The subclavian is the least preferred site (150/214 [70%]) due to concern for increased risk of complications (51%) and personal discomfort with the procedure (49%). One-hundred twenty-six (59%) of respondents reported receiving formal ultrasound (US) or echocardiography training. Respondents reported using dynamic US guidance for placement in 90% of IJ, 86% of PICC, 78% of femoral, and 12% of subclavian CVCs. Plain radiography (X-ray) was the most preferred modality for confirming CVC tip position (85%) compared with US (9%) and no imaging (5%). Most providers reported using X-ray to evaluate for pneumothorax following upper extremity CVC placement, with only 5% reporting use of US and none relying on physical exam alone. This study demonstrates wide variability in PCCM providers' CVC placement practices. Potential training gaps exist for placement of subclavian catheters and use of US.

Funder

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference23 articles.

1. Intravascular complications of central venous catheterization by insertion site;J J Parienti;N Engl J Med,2015

2. The risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with femoral venous catheters as compared to subclavian and internal jugular venous catheters: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis;P E Marik;Crit Care Med,2012

3. Central venous lines in critically ill children: thrombosis but not infection is site dependent;S C Derderian;J Pediatr Surg,2019

4. Rates of venous thromboembolism and central line-associated bloodstream infections among types of central venous access devices in critically ill children;N Patel;Crit Care Med,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3