Device-assisted enteroscopy performance measures in the United Kingdom: DEEP-UK quality improvement project

Author:

Despott Edward J.1,Sanders David S.23,Shiha Mohamed G.23ORCID,Sidhu Reena23ORCID,Lucaciu Laura A.1,Palmer-Jones Christopher1,Ayeboa-Sallah Benjamin1,Lazaridis Nikolaos1,Eckersley Robert4,Hiner George E.5,Maxfield Dominic6,Shaheen Walaa7,Abduljabbar Duaa7,Hussain Muhammad A.8,O’Hare Rosie9,Phull Perminder S.10,Eccles John9,Caddy Grant R.9,Butt Mohammed A.8,Kurup Arun7,Chattree Amit6,Hoare Jonathan5,Jennings Jason11,Longcroft-Wheaton Gaius12ORCID,Collins Paul13,Humphries Adam4,Murino Alberto1

Affiliation:

1. Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital, University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

2. Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

3. Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

4. Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark‘s Hospital and Academic Institute, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

5. Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

6. Department of Gastroenterology, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

7. Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

8. Directorates of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

9. Division of Gastroenterology, Ulster Hospital, Dundonald, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

10. Department of Digestive Disorders, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

11. Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St James‘s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

12. Department of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

13. Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Abstract

Abstract Background Device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) has become a well-established diagnostic and therapeutic tool for the management of small-bowel pathology. We aimed to evaluate the performance measures for DAE across the UK against the quality benchmarks proposed by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Methods We retrospectively collected data on patient demographics and DAE performance measures from electronic endoscopy records of consecutive patients who underwent DAE for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes across 12 enteroscopy centers in the UK between January 2017 and December 2022. Results A total of 2005 DAE procedures were performed in 1663 patients (median age 60 years; 53% men). Almost all procedures (98.1%) were performed for appropriate indications. Double-balloon enteroscopy was used for most procedures (82.0%), followed by single-balloon enteroscopy (17.2%) and spiral enteroscopy (0.7%). The estimated depth of insertion was documented in 73.4% of procedures. The overall diagnostic yield was 70.0%. Therapeutic interventions were performed in 42.6% of procedures, with a success rate of 96.6%. Overall, 78.0% of detected lesions were marked with a tattoo. Patient comfort was significantly better with the use of deep sedation compared with conscious sedation (99.7% vs. 68.5%; P<0.001). Major adverse events occurred in only 0.6% of procedures. Conclusions Performance measures for DAE in the UK meet the ESGE quality benchmarks, with high diagnostic and therapeutic yields, and a low incidence of major adverse events. However, there is room for improvement in optimizing sedation practices, standardizing the depth of insertion documentation, and adopting marking techniques to aid in the follow-up of detected lesions.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Gastroenterology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3