Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage: a Comparison of International Guidelines

Author:

Vomstein Kilian1,Aulitzky Anna1,Strobel Laura1,Bohlmann Michael2,Feil Katharina1,Rudnik-Schöneborn Sabine3,Zschocke Johannes3,Toth Bettina1

Affiliation:

1. Medical University Innsbruck, Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria

2. Zentrum für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, St Elisabethen-Krankenhaus Lörrach gGmbH, Lörrach, Germany

3. Zentrum für medizinische Genetik, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

Abstract

AbstractWhile roughly 30% of all women experience a spontaneous miscarriage in their lifetime, the incidence of recurrent (habitual) spontaneous miscarriage is 1 – 3% depending on the employed definition. The established risk factors include endocrine, anatomical, infection-related, genetic, haemostasis-related and immunological factors. Diagnosis is made more difficult by the sometimes diverging recommendations of the respective international specialist societies. The present study is therefore intended to provide a comparison of existing international guidelines and recommendations. The guidelines of the ESHRE, ASRM, the DGGG/OEGGG/SGGG and the recommendations of the RCOG were analysed. It was shown that investigation is indicated after 2 clinical pregnancies and the diagnosis should be made using a standardised timetable that includes the most frequent causes of spontaneous miscarriage. The guidelines concur that anatomical malformations, antiphospholipid syndrome and thyroid dysfunction should be excluded. Moreover, the guidelines recommend carrying out pre-conception chromosomal analysis of both partners (or of the aborted material). Other risk factors have not been included in the recommendations by all specialist societies, on the one hand because of a lack of diagnostic criteria (luteal phase insufficiency) and on the other hand because of the different age of the guidelines (chronic endometritis). In addition, various economic and consensus aspects in producing the guidelines influence the individual recommendations. An understanding of the underlying decision-making process should lead in practice to the best individual diagnosis and resulting treatment being offered to each couple.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Maternity and Midwifery,Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference74 articles.

1. WHO: recommended definitions, terminology and format for statistical tables related to the perinatal period and use of a new certificate for cause of perinatal deaths. Modifications recommended by FIGO as amended October 14, 1976;Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,1977

2. Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion;Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine;Fertil Steril,2012

3. Electronic address aao. Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion;Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine;Fertil Steril,2020

4. Recurrent miscarriage: pathophysiology and outcome;B Carrington;Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol,2005

5. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study;A M Nybo Andersen;BMJ,2000

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3