Machine Learning Classification of Psychiatric Data Associated with Compensation Claims for Patient Injuries

Author:

Juhola Martti1,Nikkanen Tommi1,Niemi Juho2,Welling Maiju3,Kampman Olli24567

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

2. Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

3. Patient Insurance Centre, Helsinki, Finland

4. Department of Psychiatry, Tampere University Hospital, Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere, Finland

5. Department of Clinical Sciences (Psychiatry), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden and Västerbotten Welfare Region, Umeå, Sweden

6. Department of Clinical Sciences (Psychiatry), University of Turku, Turku, Finland

7. The Wellbeing Services County of Ostrobothnia, Department of Psychiatry, Vaasa, Finland

Abstract

Abstract Background Adverse events are common in health care. In psychiatric treatment, compensation claims for patient injuries appear to be less common than in other medical specialties. The most common types of patient injury claims in psychiatry include diagnostic flaws, unprevented suicide, or coercive treatment deemed as unnecessary or harmful. Objectives The objective was to study whether it is possible to form different categories of patient injury types associated with the psychiatric evaluations of compensation claims and to base machine learning classification on these categories. Further, the binary classification of positive and negative decisions for compensation claims was the other objective. Methods Finnish psychiatric specialist evaluations for the compensation claims of patient injuries were classified into six different categories called classes applying the machine learning methods of artificial intelligence. In addition, another classification of the same data into two classes was performed to test whether it was possible to classify data cases according to their known decisions, either accepted or declined compensation claim. Results The former classification task produced relatively good classification results subject to separating between different classes. Instead, the latter was more complex. However, classification accuracies of both tasks could be improved by using the generation of artificial data cases in the preprocessing phase before classifications. This preprocessing improved the classification accuracy of six classes up to 88% when the method of random forests was used for classification and that of the binary classification to 89%. Conclusion The results show that the objectives defined were possible to solve reasonably.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Health Information Management,Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Health Informatics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3