Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Nivolumab in Treatment of Advanced Solid Tumors: A Retrospective Audit from Resource-Constrained Settings
-
Published:2024-07-31
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:2278-330X
-
Container-title:South Asian Journal of Cancer
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:South Asian J Cancer
Author:
Kumar Amit1, Kapoor Akhil2ORCID, Noronha Vanita1ORCID, Patil Vijay M.1, Joshi Amit1, Menon Nandini1ORCID, Janu Amit3, Mahajan Abhishek3ORCID, Rajendra Akhil1, Agarawal Amit1, Khaddar Satvik1, Rajpurohit Anu1, Kashyap Lakhan1ORCID, Srikant Anne1, Panda Gautam1ORCID, Kota Kishore Kumar1, Talreja Vikas1ORCID, Prabhash Kumar1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya Cancer Centre and Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India 3. Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Abstract
Background Immunotherapy has improved outcomes in many advanced solid tumors. In resource-constrained settings, less than 2% of patients can afford standard dose immunotherapy. A recent phase II study showed the efficacy of low-dose immunotherapy in this setting. We used low-dose immunotherapy on a compassionate basis in patients who had progressed on available standard treatment options and standard dose immunotherapy was not feasible.
Patients and Methods We retrospectively collected data from the medical oncology department for consecutive patients who had initially received standard lines of therapy followed by low-dose immunotherapy (nivolumab 40 mg) on a compassionate basis. The demographic details, histology, prior treatment, clinical and radiological response, date of disease progression, date of death, and toxicity data were collected.
Results A total of 54 consecutive patients, who received low-dose immunotherapy with nivolumab from January 1, 2018 to February 14, 2020, were included in this analysis; 4 patients were not radiologically evaluable. The median age was 50.4 years (range 35–74 years), male:female ratio was 6:1. The most common comorbidities were hypertension and diabetes seen in 12 (22.2%) and 6 (11.1%) patients, respectively. The majority of the patients (70.4%) were of head and neck cancer. The median follow-up was 4.5 months (range 0.5–11.7). Clinical benefit was observed in 18 (33.3%) patients. Partial response and stable disease were achieved in 9 (16.7%) and 5 (9.3%) patients, respectively. Median survival was not reached for these patients. Six months progression-free survival and overall survival were 100 versus 8.7% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01–0.36; p = 0.003) and 100 versus 29.7% (HR 0.03, 95% CI: 0.00–0.95; p = 0.047), respectively, for responders and nonresponders. The side effects were manageable.
Conclusion In resource-constrained settings, low-dose immunotherapy with nivolumab seems to be an effective treatment option. Further studies are warranted to evaluate this approach.
Publisher
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Reference28 articles.
1. Low-dose nivolumab can be effective in non-small cell lung cancer: alternative option for financial toxicity;S H Yoo;ESMO Open,2018 2. Nivolumab for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck;R L Ferris;N Engl J Med,2016 3. Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study;E EW Cohen;Lancet,2019 4. Optimal design and endpoint of clinical trials using immune checkpoint blocking agents;B Keam;Expert Rev Anticancer Ther,2016 5. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer;S L Topalian;N Engl J Med,2012
|
|