Marginal versus Segmental Mandibulectomy in the Treatment of Oral Cavity Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Author:

Chiesa-Estomba Carlos Miguel1ORCID,Mayo-Yanez Miguel2,Manelli Giuditta3,Molteni Gabriele4,Lechien Jerome5,Fakhry Nicolas6,Melkane Antoine7,Calvo-Henriquez Christian8,Kalfert David9,Ayad Tareck10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Donostia, San Sebastian, Guipuzcoa, Spain

2. Department of ENT, Hospital Juan Canalejo de La Coruña, A Coruna, Galicia, Spain

3. Department of ENT, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Toscana, Italy

4. Department of ENT, Università degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy

5. Department of ENT, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, Île-de-France, France

6. Department of ENT, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azu, France

7. Department of ENT, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu de France, Beirut, Lebanon

8. Department of ENT, Hospital Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain

9. Department of ENT, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic

10. Department of ENT, University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is the most common malignancy in the oral cavity. Two types of mandibular resections have been described: the segmental mandibulectomy and the marginal mandibulectomy. Both may have a different impact over the quality of life, oncological prognosis, and functional or aesthetic result. Objectives The aim of this study was to systematically explore the literature to determine the survival outcomes and disease control rates in patients who underwent segmental or marginal mandibulectomy for OCSCC with histological evidence of cortical and medullary bone invasion. Data Synthesis This review involved a systematic search of the electronic databases MEDLINE/PUBMED, Google Scholar, Ovid Medline, Embase, and Scopus including articles from 1985 to 2019. Fifteen articles were included for qualitative analysis and 11 articles were considered for meta-analysis calculations. All of them correspond to retrospective cohort studies. Conclusion This systematic review reveals the low-level evidence regarding the impact over local control or survival according to the type of mandibulectomy. Our results need to be considered with precaution according to the limited evidence available. We just found difference regarding the 5-year disease-free survival, and a tendency in favor of segmental mandibulectomy was confirmed when medullary invasion was evident.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3