Integrated versus non-integrated peripheral intravenous catheters: a cross-sectional survey of nurse experiences-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Integrated versus non-integrated peripheral intravenous catheters: a cross-sectional survey of nurse experiences

Published:2023-01-26 Issue:2 Volume:32 Page:S6-S16
ISSN:0966-0461
Container-title:British Journal of Nursing
language:en
Short-container-title:Br J Nurs

Author:

Paterson Rebecca S¹,Larsen Emily N²,Cooke Marie³,Rickard Claire M⁴,Walker Rachel M⁵,Marsh Nicole⁶

Affiliation:

1. Senior Research Assistant, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

2. Research Fellow, Vascular Access, Griffith University and Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

3. Professor Emeritus, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia

4. Professor, Infection Prevention and Vascular Access, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

5. Associate Professor, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University and Division of Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

6. Professor and Nursing and Midwifery Director (Research), Griffith University and Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

Abstract

Background: Integrated peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) demonstrate clinical efficacy, however, device complexity and design differences may be a potential barrier to implementation. Aims: To assess nurse acceptability of integrated PIVC systems. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was nested within a multicentre randomised controlled trial. One hundred nurses caring for patients with integrated and non-integrated PIVCs completed a 17-item survey about key differences between devices (eg function and appearance, perceived patient comfort and skin injuries). Findings: Most nurses reported the integrated PIVC wings prevented device movement (80%), achieved patient comfort in areas of flexion (78%), and no patients developed skin injuries (100%). Nurses rated the ease of accessing and overall confidence using the integrated PIVC as significantly higher than the non-integrated design (P<0.001).Conclusion: The integrated PIVC received positive feedback from nurses and had few barriers to implementation.

Publisher

Mark Allen Group

Subject

General Nursing

Link

http://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/pdf/10.12968/bjon.2023.32.2.S6

Reference34 articles.

1. Focused Simulation Training: Emergency Department Nurses’ Confidence and Comfort Level in Performing Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Access

2. Use of Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes Worldwide

3. A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Complications of 2 Peripheral Intravenous Catheter-Stabilization Systems

4. Improving peripheral cannulation practice at an NHS Trust