Affiliation:
1. From the Leukaemia Research Fund Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
AbstractIdentical infant twins with concordant leukemia were first described in 1882, and since that time many such pairs of infants and older children have been described. It has long been recognized that this situation offers a unique opportunity to identify aspects of the developmental timing, natural history, and molecular genetics of pediatric leukemia in general. We reviewed both the older literature and more recent molecular biologic studies that have uncovered the basis of concordance of leukemia. Molecular markers of clonality, including unique, genomic fusion gene sequences, have provided unequivocal evidence that twin pairs of leukemia have a common clonal origin. The only plausible basis for this, first suggested more than 40 years ago, is that following initiation of leukemia in one twin fetus, clonal progeny spread to the co-twin via vascular anastomoses within a single, monochorionic placenta. This explanation has been endorsed by the identification of clonotypic gene fusion sequences in archived neonatal blood spots of individuals who subsequently developed leukemia. These analyses of twin leukemias have thrown considerable light on the natural history of disease. They reveal a frequent prenatal origin and an early or initiating role for chromosome translocations. Further, they provide evidence for a variable and often protracted latency and the need, in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)/acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML), for further postnatal exposures and/or genetic events to produce clinical disease. We argue that these insights provide a very useful framework for attempts to understand etiologic mechanisms. (Blood. 2003;102:2321-2333)
Publisher
American Society of Hematology
Subject
Cell Biology,Hematology,Immunology,Biochemistry
Reference138 articles.
1. Gedda L. Twins in History and Science. Spring-field, IL: Charles C Thomas; 1961.
2. Wright L. Twins. New York, NY: Weidenfeld & Nicolson/Wiley; 1997.
3. Galton F. The history of twins, as a criterion of the relative powers of nature and nurture. J Anthropol Inst Gr Br Ir. 1875;5: 391-406.
4. Rende RD, Plomin R, Vandenberg SG. Who discovered the twin method? Behav Genet. 1990;20: 277-285.
5. Hrubec Z, Robinette CD. The study of human twins in medical research. N Engl J Med. 1984;310: 435-441.
Cited by
428 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献