Levofloxacin Prophylaxis Is Effective and Cost-Effective in Pediatric Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Author:

McCormick Meghan1,Friehling Erika2,Kalpatthi Ram1,Smith Ken3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

2. Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

3. Division of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Bacterial sepsis is a common complication in pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing intensive myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Up to 60% of children experience at least one documented infectious complication during therapy, with bacterial causes being most common; infection related mortality may reach 11% (Sung et al, Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 2008). Randomized controlled trials in children undergoing intensive chemotherapy have demonstrated a reduction in bacteremia risk with prophylactic levofloxacin use. This study evaluates epidemiologic data regarding factors associated with levofloxacin use, the impact of levofloxacin on infectious outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of this strategy. Methods: We queried the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database, which collects billing and coding data from 52 pediatric hospitals, for inpatient encounters of children with AML admitted for chemotherapy with a length of stay ≥14 days from 2013-2018. We collected demographics, information on infectious outcomes and utilization of hospital resources. Variables were compared between children who received levofloxacin prophylaxis during their hospitalization and those who did not using chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and t-test of means for continuous variables. We next developed a decision model comparing levofloxacin prophylaxis through count nadir until recovery to no prophylaxis during a single chemotherapy cycle for AML using published data from randomized controlled trials. We assumed bacteremia was present only in the setting of fevers. We used published literature to estimate the probability of ICU admission or death with or without bacteremia. It was assumed that antibacterial prophylaxis only altered the probabilities of febrile neutropenia and bacteremia. Strategies were compared to analyze incremental costs per bacteremia episode avoided, ICU admission avoided and death avoided. Medication costs were obtained from the Federal Supply Schedule. Costs related to infectious complications and ICU admissions were obtained for patients with AML from PHIS during the 2018 calendar year. Multiple sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of results. Results: Overall, 26.3% of children received levofloxacin prophylaxis. The decision to use prophylaxis varied significantly by geographic division, AML disease status, year of admission and chemotherapy regimen (Table 1). Patients who received prophylaxis had decreased risk of bacterial infection, C. diff infection, ICU admission and overall antibiotic exposure, not including levofloxacin, during that encounter (Table 2). There was no significant difference between groups regarding length of stay or hospitalization costs. In PHIS, each bacteremia episode added an average of $119,478 to hospitalization costs. Using baseline probabilities from our literature review, levofloxacin prophylaxis cost $7,252 per bacteremia episode avoided compared with no prophylaxis. This resulted in cost savings of over $100,000 with prophylaxis as the favored strategy. When probabilities for each parameter in the model were altered by 1-way sensitivity analyses, results were sensitive to variation in bacteremia risk with prophylaxis, febrile neutropenia risk, levofloxacin cost and the cost of levofloxacin-related adverse events. However, none of the variations in parameter values generated a result which exceeded a cost-effectiveness threshold of $50,000 per bacteremia episode avoided. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, when all parameters were varied simultaneously over the distribution of their potential probabilities, the probability that levofloxacin use was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 was 95.1%. When considering other outcomes, levofloxacin prophylaxis cost $73,088 per ICU admission avoided compared to actual added costs of $94,181, or $198,525 per death avoided. Conclusions: Based on available evidence, antibacterial prophylaxis with levofloxacin is effective in reducing bacterial sepsis in pediatric AML patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy. Levofloxacin prophylaxis may also be cost saving when the costs of infectious complications and other adverse health outcomes are considered.

Publisher

American Society of Hematology

Subject

Cell Biology,Hematology,Immunology,Biochemistry

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3