Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: t(8;21) and inv(16) represent different clinical outcomes

Author:

Kuwatsuka Yachiyo1,Miyamura Koichi1,Suzuki Ritsuro2,Kasai Masaharu3,Maruta Atsuo4,Ogawa Hiroyasu5,Tanosaki Ryuji6,Takahashi Satoshi7,Koda Kyuhei8,Yago Kazuhiro9,Atsuta Yoshiko2,Yoshida Takashi10,Sakamaki Hisashi11,Kodera Yoshihisa1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya First Hospital, Nagoya;

2. Department of HSCT Data Management, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya;

3. Department of Hematology, Sapporo Hokuyu Hospital, Sapporo;

4. Department of Hematology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama;

5. Department of Molecular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka;

6. Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo;

7. Department of Hematology, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo;

8. Department of Hematology, Asahikawa Red Cross Hospital, Asahikawa;

9. Department of Hematology, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka;

10. Hematology Department, Toyama Prefectural Hospital, Toyama; and

11. Department of Hematology, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

We analyzed 338 adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with t(8;21) and inv(16) undergoing stem cell transplantation (SCT) who were registered in the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation database. At 3 years, overall survival (OS) of patients with t(8;21) and inv(16) was 50% and 72%, respectively (P = .002). Although no difference was observed when restricted to allogeneic SCT in first complete remission (CR; 84% and 74%), OS of patients with t(8;21) and inv(16) undergoing allogeneic SCT in second or third CR (45% and 86% at 3 years; P = .008) was different. OS was not different between patients in first CR who received allogeneic SCT and those who received autologous SCT for both t(8;21) AML (84% vs 77%; P = .49) and inv(16) AML (74% vs 59%; P = .86). Patients with inv(16) not in CR did better after allogeneic SCT than those with t(8;21) (70% and 18%; P = .03). Patients with t(8;21) and inv(16) should be managed differently as to the application of SCT. SCT in first CR is not necessarily recommended for inv(16). For t(8;21) patients in first CR, a prospective trial is needed to clarify the significance of autologous SCT and allogeneic SCT over chemotherapy.

Publisher

American Society of Hematology

Subject

Cell Biology,Hematology,Immunology,Biochemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3