Exploring racial/ethnic disparities in rehabilitation outcomes after TBI: A Veterans Affairs Model Systems study

Author:

Liou-Johnson Victoria12,Merced Kritzia3,Klyce Daniel W.345,Agtarap Stephanie6,Finn Jacob A.78,Chung Joyce S.9,Campbell Thomas3,Harris Odette A.10,Perrin Paul B.311

Affiliation:

1. Polytrauma System of Care, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA

2. Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA

3. Central Virginia Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Richmond, VA, USA

4. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Common wealth University, Richmond, VA, USA

5. Sheltering Arms Institute, Richmond, VA, USA

6. Department of Research, Craig Hospital, Englewood, CO, USA

7. Rehabilitation and Extended Care, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA

8. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

9. Rehabilitation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA

10. Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA

11. School of Data Science and Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Almost one-third of the U.S. military population is comprised of service members and veterans (SMVs) of color. Research suggests poorer functional and psychosocial outcomes among Black and Hispanic/Latine vs. White civilians following traumatic brain injury (TBI). OBJECTIVE: This study examined racial/ethnic differences in 5-year functional independence and life satisfaction trajectories among SMVs who had undergone acute rehabilitation at one of five Veterans Affairs (VA) TBI Model Systems (TBIMS) Polytrauma Rehabilitation Centers (PRCs). METHODS: Differences in demographic and injury-related factors were assessed during acute rehabilitation among White (n = 663), Black (n = 89), and Hispanic/Latine (n = 124) groups. Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Motor, FIM Cognitive, and Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) scores were collected at 1, 2, and 5 years after injury. Racial/ethnic comparisons in these outcome trajectories were made using hierarchical linear modeling. RESULTS: Black SMVs were less likely than White and Hispanic/Latine SMVs to have been deployed to a combat zone; there were no other racial/ethnic differences in any demographic or injury-related variable assessed. In terms of outcomes, no racial/ethnic differences emerged in FIM Motor, FIM cognitive, or SWLS trajectories. CONCLUSION: The absence of observable racial/ethnic differences in 5-year outcome trajectories after TBI among SMVs from VA TBIMS PRCs contrasts sharply with previous research identifying disparities in these same outcomes and throughout the larger VA health care system. Individuals enrolled in VA PRCs are likely homogenized on key social determinants of health that would otherwise contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in outcome trajectories.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference67 articles.

1. Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale in people with traumatic brain, spinal cord, or burn injury: A national institute on disability, independent living, and rehabilitation research model system study;Amtmann,;Assessment,2019

2. Therapeutic alliance, cultural competence and minority status in premature termination of psychotherapy;Anderson,;American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,2019

3. Race/ethnicity differences in satisfaction with life among persons with traumatic brain injury;Arango-Lasprilla,;Neuro Rehabilitation,2009

4. The influence of minority status on job stability after traumatic brain injury;Arango-Lasprilla,;PM & R: The Journal of Injury, Function, and Rehabilitation,2009

5. Racial and ethnic disparities in functional, psychosocial, and neurobehavioral outcomes after brain injury;Arango-Lasprilla,;The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation,2010

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3