Affiliation:
1. Occupational Health and Safety EducationApplication and Research Center, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, Turkey
2. Department of Industrial Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Besiktas, Istanbul, Turkey
Abstract
Risk management is the key factor to obtain safety in the working environment and its effectiveness increases with accuracy assessment and robust analysis. However, it is hard to succeed because of uncertainties in the working environment. Therefore, there are a lot of risk assessment methods in the literature to assess occupational health and safety risks. The traditional risk assessment methods handle each activity in the working environment separately and they do not consider the interactions among them. Furthermore, in these methods, potential outcomes of the risk parameters are considered based on the most possible outcome although there may be more than one potential outcome. Differ from the traditional methods, The House of Safety method has been proposed to consider all potential outcomes and handle the interactions among the activities. In this study, an extension of The House of Safety is proposed to consider interactions among potential risks and to determine the most effective prevention method based on the potential risks. Hence, this extension provides an evaluation of the whole system. The proposed model has been developed by integrating Fuzzy Inference System (FIS), Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP), and DEMATEL into Quality Function Deployment (QFD). In this direction, FIS is used to determine activity-related probabilities, “FAHP” is utilized to identify all possible damage potentials of risks, and the DEMATEL is used to clarify interactions among risks. Finally, all information produced by these methods were aggregated to obtain total risk scores by using QFD. In addition, a second home has been created to link prevention and risks. Therefore, an effective prevention plan has been made to eliminate priority risks with all effective parameters. This stage provides the opportunity for optimum prevention plan against risk or risk groups dominating the system at the same time. In this study, unlike traditional methods including a partial risk assessment perspective, an integrated method that takes into account the risks on their own and the interactions between them is proposed in the literature, and the proposed approach has been applied to an open pit mine.
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,General Engineering,Statistics and Probability
Reference28 articles.
1. Rausand M. , “ Risk Assessment: Theory, Methods, and Applications”, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey, 2011.
2. Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: On a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000–2009;Marhavilas;Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2011
3. Hubbards D. and Evans D. , Problems with scoring methods and ordinal scales in risk assessment, IBM Journal of Research and Development 54(3) (2010).
4. Risk analysis of health, safety and environment in chemical industry integrating linguistic FMEA, fuzzy inference system and fuzzy DEA;Jahangoshai Rezaee;Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess,2020
5. Developing a new fuzzy inference system for pipeline risk assessment;Jamshidi;Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2013
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献