Psychometric properties of the English language version of the C-BiLLT evaluated in typically developing Canadian children

Author:

Bootsma Jael N.12,Campbell Fiona13,McCauley Dayle2,Hopmans Sarah2,Grahovac Danijela2,Cunningham BJ24,Phoenix Michelle12,de Camargo Olaf Kraus25,Geytenbeek Johanna6,Gorter Jan Willem278

Affiliation:

1. School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

2. CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

3. Technology Access Clinic, Developmental Pediatrics and Rehabilitation RJCHC, McMaster Children’s Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada

4. School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Western University, Elborn College, London, ON, Canada

5. Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

6. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, CP Expertise Center, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

7. Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

8. Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to 1) investigate the convergent and discriminant validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of the Canadian English version of the Computer-Based instrument for Low motor Language Testing (C-BiLLT-CAN), and 2) explore feasibility of the C-BiLLT assessment for children with cerebral palsy (CP) and complex communication needs in the Canadian health care context. METHODS: Eighty typically developing children between 1.5 and 8.5 years of age completed the C-BiLLT-CAN, the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-IV (PPVT-4), the receptive language sub-test of the New Reynell Developmental Language Scales (NRDLS), and/or the Raven’s 2. Correlations between raw scores were calculated for estimates of convergent and discriminant validity. Internal consistency was calculated for all items and separately for items pertaining to vocabulary and grammar. To calculate the standard error of measurement (SEM) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), 33 participants were re-tested with the C-BiLLT within three weeks. Feasibility was explored with nine participants with CP. RESULTS: C-BiLLT-CAN’s convergent validity was good to excellent (Spearman’s rho > 0.78) and discriminant validity was higher than hypothesized (Spearman’s rho > 0.8). Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96), test-retest reliability (ICC > 0.9), and measurement error (SEM < 5%) were excellent. The feasibility study could not be fully completed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Preliminary data demonstrated some technical and practical barriers for using the C-BiLLT in children with CP in Canada. CONCLUSION: The C-BiLLT-CAN showed good to excellent psychometric properties in a sample of typically developing children, indicating that it is an adequate test for measuring language comprehension in English-speaking Canadian children. Further research is needed to investigate the feasibility of the C-BiLLT-CAN in children with CP.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference40 articles.

1. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006;Rosenbaum;Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl,2007

2. An update on the prevalence of cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Oskoui;Dev Med Child Neurol,2013

3. Cerebral palsy in Canada, –results of a microsimulation modelling study of epidemiological and cost impacts;Amankwah;Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can,2020

4. Cerebral palsy in Norway: Prevalence, subtypes and severity;Andersen;Eur J Paediatr Neurol,2008

5. Brain lesions in preterms: origin, consequences and compensation;Krägeloh-Mann;Acta Paediatr,1999

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3