Examination of Matching Methods, Sparse Effects, and Limitations in a Nationwide Database Study on Alzheimer’s Disease

Author:

Tzeng I-Shiang1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Research, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan

Abstract

Akada et al. conducted a nationwide database study on patients with Alzheimer’s disease, examining risk factors and outcomes over 3 years. A significant association emerged between decreased daily activities and hip fractures. However, the odds ratio was 1.95 (with p = 0.020) may be inaccurate in men, considering the wide 95% confidence interval (1.12–3.51). Possible influencing factors include an inappropriate outcome variable, sparse-data bias, collinear covariates, and comorbidities. Moreover, exact propensity-score matching would be more efficient than nested matching. Limitations include potential recall bias in measuring daily activities and limited applicability of cause-effect relationships in a national database study.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Clinical Psychology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference8 articles.

1. Nationwide database analysis of risk factors associated with decreased activities of daily living in patients with Alzheimer’s disease;Akada;J Alzheimers Dis,2023

2. Sparse data bias: A problem hiding in plain sight;Greenland;BMJ,2016

3. Penalization, bias reduction, and default priors in logistic and related categorical and survival regressions.;Greenland;Stat Med,2015

4. Dealing with the problem of monotone likelihood in the inflation of estimated effects in clinical studies. Comment on Hasegawa et al. Impact of blood type O on mortality of sepsis patients: A multicenter retrospective observational study;Tzeng;Diagnostics 2020,10, 826.,2022

5. Ultrasound guidance for central venous catheterisation. A Colombian national survey.;Calvache;Int J Qual Health Care,2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3