Use of calibrated automated thrombinography ± thrombomodulin to recognise the prothrombotic phenotype

Abstract

SummaryThere is currently no validated method to detect a prothrombotic phenotype. The question remains, can tissue factor (TF) induced thrombin generation (TG), as measured with the calibrated automated thrombinography (CAT) technique, according to Hemker et al., recognise a prothrombotic state either as such, or when the activated proteinC (APC)-system is boosted with thrombomodulin (TM)? We determined the normal range of CAT-TG ± TM in a group of 71 healthy blood donors, in 11 healthy women using oral contraceptives (OC), and in 89 patients with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), divided into a group of 50 in whicha prothrombotic risk factor could be found (VTEprf+) and 39 others (VTEprf-). The endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) in the OC, VTEprf+ and VTEprf-group was significantly higher than for the controls. In the presence of TM, the differences were significantly higher than in its absence. The VTEprf+ group had a higher ETP, ± TM than the VTEprf group. In conclusion,TG, measured with the CAT technique in the presence of TM is capable of detecting the prothrombotic phenotype with a high sensitivity of 0.93 (95% confidence limits 0.82–0.99).