Extremely Low-Volume Burpee Interval Training Equivalent to 8 Minutes Per Session Improves Vertical Jump Compared with Sprint Interval Training in Real-World Circumstances

Author:

Pérez-Ifrán Pablo1,Magallanes Carlos A.1,de S. Castro Flávio A.2,Astorino Todd A.3,Benítez-Flores Stefano1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physical Education and Health, Higher Institute of Physical Education, University of the Republic, Montevideo, Uruguay;

2. Aquatic Sports Research Group, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Dance, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil; and

3. Department of Kinesiology, California State University San Marcos, San Marcos, California

Abstract

Abstract Pérez-Ifrán, P, Magallanes, CA, de S. Castro, FA, Astorino, TA, and Benítez-Flores, S. Extremely low-volume burpee interval training equivalent to 8 minutes per session improves vertical jump compared with sprint interval training in real-world circumstances. J Strength Cond Res 38(1): 10–20, 2024—The aim of this study was to compare the cardiometabolic and physical effects of 2 time-matched high-intensity programs in a real-world environment. Forty-three active and healthy adults (sex = 31 men and 12 women; age = 27 ± 5 years; peak heart rate [HRpeak] = 190.7 ± 10.6 beat·min−1) were randomized to 2 very low-volume protocols (∼8 minutes): sprint interval training (SIT) (n = 15), burpee interval training (BIT) (n = 15), and control (CON) (n = 13). Subjects in SIT and BIT performed 5 days of 10 × 4 second “all-out” efforts with 30 seconds of recovery. Body composition, blood pressure, countermovement jump (CMJ), 10-m sprint, shuttle run test (SRT), autonomic modulation, self-efficacy, and intention were evaluated before and after training. Sprint interval training elicited a higher %HRpeak, energy expenditure, rating of perceived exertion category ratio 10 scale, and feeling scale than BIT (p < 0.05). SRTdistance was significantly improved in SIT (p = 0.03, d = 0.62), whereas CMJ height was significantly enhanced in BIT (p = 0.0014, d = 0.72). Self-efficacy progressively worsened for SIT than for BIT as sessions increased, and significant differences were found in 5× a week frequency between protocols (p = 0.040, d = 0.79). No differences in intention to engage were detected between the regimens (p > 0.05). No changes were observed in body composition, blood pressure, 10-m sprint, SRTV̇O2max, or autonomic variables with training (p > 0.05). Results exhibit that extremely low-volume SIT improved running performance, whereas BIT increased the vertical jump.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3