Abstract
In contemporary times, air pollution has emerged as a pressing concern in major metropolises worldwide. Particulate matter, particularly PM2.5, has been identified as a key contributor to elevated pollution levels. While previous studies in Thailand have primarily focused on PM2.5 in agricultural, forestry, and industrial regions, they often examine its relationship with precursor gases (e.g., SO2, NOx, VOCs, and NH3) and hotspots. However, research pertaining to the capital city, Bangkok, remains limited due to its complex source composition and unnatural urban structure, leading to unique airborne conditions. This study seeks to explore the interplay between PM2.5, precursor gases, and meteorological factors in Bangkok. To assess the influence of precursor gases and meteorological variables on PM2.5 concentrations, correlation analysis and regression techniques were applied to monitoring data obtained from relevant government agencies. Notably, PM2.5 exhibited strong correlations with precursor gases, especially NO2 (correlation coefficient, R, ranging from 0.11 to 0.87), while SO2 showed more variable correlations (R ranging from -0.45 to 0.85). Furthermore, meteorological factors exhibited significant but slightly weaker correlations with PM2.5 compared to SO2 and NO2. This suggests that NO2 plays a dominant role in driving the secondary formation of PM2.5 in the Bang Na area. Regression analysis confirmed the strong association of NO2, SO2, and relative humidity with PM2.5, while other meteorological parameters displayed less significance, even the planetary boundary layer. Contrary to previous studies that primarily rely on real-time monitoring for short durations and emphasize potential pollution sources, our research underscores the pivotal role of precursor gases, particularly under high relative humidity conditions. To elucidate the secondary formation of PM2.5 from precursor gases within urban settings, future studies should encompass longer-term real-time monitoring of both precursor gases and meteorological variables, especially in urban areas
Publisher
International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences
Reference13 articles.
1. Baker KR and Foley KM (2011). A nonlinear regression model estimating single source concentrations of primary and secondarily formed PM2.5. Atmospheric Environment, 45(22): 3758-3767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.074
2. Bewick V, Cheek L, and Ball J (2003). Statistics review 7: Correlation and regression. Critical Care, 7: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2401 PMid:14624685 PMCid:PMC374386
3. Byrd T, Stack M, and Furey A (2010). The assessment of the presence and main constituents of particulate matter ten microns (PM10) in Irish, rural and urban air. Atmospheric Environment, 44(1): 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.09.037
4. Fahimeh H and Azadeh H (2012). Influence of meteorological parameters on air pollution in Isfahan. In the 3rd International Conference on Biology, Environment and Chemistry, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
5. Hodan WM and Barnard WR (2004). Evaluating the contribution of PM2.5 precursor gases and re-entrained road emissions to mobile source PM2.5 particulate matter emissions. MACTEC Federal Programs, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.