Status of Hemoglobin A1c Measurement and Goals for Improvement: From Chaos to Order for Improving Diabetes Care

Author:

Little Randie R1,Rohlfing Curt L1,Sacks David B23

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences and Child Health, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine, Columbia, MO

2. Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

3. current affiliation: Department of Laboratory Medicine, NIH, Bethesda, MD

Abstract

BACKGROUND The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) established the importance of hemoglobin A1c (Hb A1c) as a predictor of outcome in patients with diabetes mellitus. In 1994, the American Diabetes Association began recommending specific Hb A1c targets, but lack of comparability among assays limited the ability of clinicians to use these targets. The National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) was implemented in 1996 to standardize Hb A1c results to those of the DCCT/UKPDS. CONTENT The NGSP certifies manufacturers of Hb A1c methods as traceable to the DCCT. The certification criteria have been tightened over time and the NGSP has worked with the College of American Pathologists in tightening proficiency-testing requirements. As a result, variability of Hb A1c results among clinical laboratories has been considerably reduced. The IFCC has developed a reference system for Hb A1c that facilitates metrological traceability to a higher order. The NGSP maintains traceability to the IFCC network via ongoing sample comparisons. There has been controversy over whether to report Hb A1c results in IFCC or NGSP units, or as estimated average glucose. Individual countries are making this decision. SUMMARY Variability among Hb A1c results has been greatly reduced. Not all countries will report Hb A1c in the same units, but there are established equations that enable conversion between different units. Hb A1c is now recommended for diagnosing diabetes, further accentuating the need for optimal assay performance. The NGSP will continue efforts to improve Hb A1c testing to ensure that clinical needs are met.

Funder

NGSP

CDC funding

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Biochemistry, medical,Clinical Biochemistry

Reference48 articles.

1. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus;The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group;N Engl J Med,1993

2. Prolonged effect of intensive therapy on the risk of retinopathy complications in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: 10 years after the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial;White;Arch Ophthalmol,2008

3. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group;U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group;Lancet,1998

4. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2010;American Diabetes Association;Diabetes Care

5. International Diabetes Federation. Global Guideline for Type 2 Diabetes. http://www.idf.org/webdata/docs/GGT2D%2006%20Glucose%20control%20levels.pdf (Accessed August 2010).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3