Qualitative Assessment of the Progesterone Receptor and HER2 Improves the Nottingham Prognostic Index Up to 5 Years After Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Author:

Van Belle Vanya1,Van Calster Ben1,Brouckaert Olivier1,Vanden Bempt Isabelle1,Pintens Saskia1,Harvey Vernon1,Murray Paula1,Naume Björn1,Wiedswang Gro1,Paridaens Robert1,Moerman Philippe1,Amant Frederic1,Leunen Karin1,Smeets Ann1,Drijkoningen Maria1,Wildiers Hans1,Christiaens Marie-Rose1,Vergote Ignace1,Van Huffel Sabine1,Neven Patrick1

Affiliation:

1. From the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven; Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven; Virga Jesse Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium; Auckland Breast Cancer Registry, Greenlane Clinical Centre; Regional Cancer Centre, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; Ullevål University; and Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Abstract

PurposeTo investigate whether the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) can improve the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) in the classification of patients with primary operable breast cancer for disease-free survival (DFS).Patients and MethodsThe analysis is based on 1,927 patients with breast cancer treated between 2000 and 2005 at the University Hospitals, Leuven. We compared performances of NPI with and without ER, PR and/or HER2. Validation was done on two external data sets containing 862 and 2,805 patients from Oslo (Norway) and Auckland (New Zealand), respectively.ResultsIn the Leuven cohort, median follow-up was 66 months, and 13.7% of patients experienced a breast cancer–related event. Positive staining for ER, PR, and HER2 was detected, respectively, in 86.9%, 75.5%, and 11.9% of patients. Based on multivariate Cox regression modeling, the improved NPI (iNPI) was derived as NPI − PR positivity + HER2 positivity. Validation results showed a risk group reclassification of 20% to 30% of patients when using iNPI with its optimal risk boundaries versus NPI, in a majority of patients to more appropriate risk groups. An additional 10% of patients were classified into the extreme risk groups, where clinical actions are less ambiguous. Survival curves of reclassified patients resembled more closely those for patients in the same iNPI group than those for patients in the same NPI group.ConclusionThe addition of PR and HER2 to NPI increases its 5-year prognostic accuracy. The iNPI can be considered as a clinically useful tool for stratification of patients with breast cancer receiving standard of care.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3