Oncologist-Reported Barriers and Facilitators to Enrolling Patients in Optimization Trials That Test Less Intense Cancer Treatment

Author:

Rocque Gabrielle B.123ORCID,Andrews Courtney4ORCID,Lawhon Valerie M.1,Frazier Rachel1,Ingram Stacey A.1,Smith Mary Lou5,Wagner Lynne I.6ORCID,Zubkoff Lisa378,Tung Nadine9ORCID,Wallner Lauren P.10ORCID,Wolff Antonio C.11ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Birmingham, AL

2. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Birmingham, AL

3. O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL

4. Institute for Human Rights, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

5. Research Advocacy Network, Plano, TX

6. Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC

7. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, Birmingham, AL

8. Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Birmingham VA Healthcare System, Birmingham, AL

9. Dana‐Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA

10. University of Michigan, Departments of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI

11. The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Abstract

PURPOSE: As outcomes improve in early-stage breast cancer, clinical trials are undergoing a paradigm shift from intensification trials (more therapy) to improve survival to optimization trials, which assess the potential for using less toxic therapy while preserving survival outcomes. However, little is known about physician perspectives in community and academic settings about possible barriers and facilitators that could affect accrual to optimization clinical trials and the generalizability of future findings. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study with semistructured interviews of medical oncologists from different academic and community practices to assess their perspectives on optimization trials. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Three independent coders used a content analysis approach to analyze transcripts using NVivo. Major themes and exemplary quotes were extracted. RESULTS: All 39 physicians reported that they would enroll patients in optimization clinical trials. Oncologists highlighted specific reasons to consider optimization trials. These included quality-of-life improvement by reducing toxicity, reduction in financial toxicity, fertility preservation, ability to avoid chemotherapy, minimization of overtreatment in patients with comorbid conditions, personalized treatment, opportunities to test novel therapies, and leveraging the availability of targeted therapies. Oncologists also identified accrual barriers, such as tumor-specific biology, individual (host) factors, prognostic markers of risk, access to therapies, provider experience, and system constraints. They voiced recommendations regarding preliminary data, trial design, and tools to support enrollment in optimization trials. CONCLUSION: Although oncologists are generally willing to enroll patients on optimization clinical trials, barriers affect their acceptance. A scientific focus on overcoming these barriers is needed to support future enrollment on trials tailoring therapy on the basis of risk and potential benefit to allow true personalization of treatment.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Oncology (nursing),Health Policy,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3