Genomic Classification and Individualized Prognosis in Multiple Myeloma

Author:

Maura Francesco1ORCID,Rajanna Arjun Raj1ORCID,Ziccheddu Bachisio1,Poos Alexandra M.23,Derkach Andriy4ORCID,Maclachlan Kylee5ORCID,Durante Michael1ORCID,Diamond Benjamin1ORCID,Papadimitriou Marios1,Davies Faith6ORCID,Boyle Eileen M.6ORCID,Walker Brian7ORCID,Hultcrantz Malin5ORCID,Silva Ariosto8,Hampton Oliver9,Teer Jamie K.10ORCID,Siegel Erin M.11ORCID,Bolli Niccolò1213,Jackson Graham H.14ORCID,Kaiser Martin15ORCID,Pawlyn Charlotte16ORCID,Cook Gordon17ORCID,Kazandjian Dickran1ORCID,Stein Caleb17,Chesi Marta17ORCID,Bergsagel Leif17ORCID,Mai Elias K.2ORCID,Goldschmidt Hartmut2ORCID,Weisel Katja C.18ORCID,Fenk Roland19ORCID,Raab Marc S.23ORCID,Van Rhee Fritz20ORCID,Usmani Saad5ORCID,Shain Kenneth H.8ORCID,Weinhold Niels23ORCID,Morgan Gareth6,Landgren Ola1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Myeloma Division, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL

2. Heidelberg Myeloma Center, Department of Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

3. Clinical Cooperation Unit (CCU) Molecular Hematology/Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

5. Myeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

6. Myeloma Research Program, New York University Langone, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY

7. Division of Hematology Oncology, Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN

8. Department of Malignant Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

9. Aster Insights, Tampa, FL

10. Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL

11. Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

12. Hematology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy

13. Department of Oncology and Onco-Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

14. Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom

15. The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom

16. Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

17. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA

18. Department of Oncology, Hematology and Blood and Marrow Transplant, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

19. Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, University-Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany

20. Myeloma Institute for Research & Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR

Abstract

PURPOSE Outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) are heterogenous, with overall survival (OS) ranging from months to over 10 years. METHODS To decipher and predict the molecular and clinical heterogeneity of NDMM, we assembled a series of 1,933 patients with available clinical, genomic, and therapeutic data. RESULTS Leveraging a comprehensive catalog of genomic drivers, we identified 12 groups, expanding on previous gene expression–based molecular classifications. To build a model predicting individualized risk in NDMM (IRMMa), we integrated clinical, genomic, and treatment variables. To correct for time-dependent variables, including high-dose melphalan followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDM-ASCT), and maintenance therapy, a multi-state model was designed. The IRMMa model accuracy was significantly higher than all comparator prognostic models, with a c-index for OS of 0.726, compared with International Staging System (ISS; 0.61), revised-ISS (0.572), and R2-ISS (0.625). Integral to model accuracy was 20 genomic features, including 1q21 gain/amp, del 1p, TP53 loss, NSD2 translocations, APOBEC mutational signatures, and copy-number signatures (reflecting the complex structural variant chromothripsis). IRMMa accuracy and superiority compared with other prognostic models were validated on 256 patients enrolled in the GMMG-HD6 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02495922 ) clinical trial. Individualized patient risks were significantly affected across the 12 genomic groups by different treatment strategies (ie, treatment variance), which was used to identify patients for whom HDM-ASCT is particularly effective versus patients for whom the impact is limited. CONCLUSION Integrating clinical, demographic, genomic, and therapeutic data, to our knowledge, we have developed the first individualized risk-prediction model enabling personally tailored therapeutic decisions for patients with NDMM.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3