Normal Risk Ovarian Screening Study: 21-Year Update

Author:

Han Chae Young1ORCID,Lu Karen H.2ORCID,Corrigan Gwen1ORCID,Perez Alexandra1,Kohring Sharlene D.1,Celestino Joseph2,Bedi Deepak3ORCID,Bedia Enrique4ORCID,Bevers Therese5,Boruta David2,Carlson Matthew6,Holman Laura7,Leeds Leroy89,Mathews Cara10ORCID,McCann Georgia11,Moore Richard G.12ORCID,Schlumbrecht Matthew13ORCID,Slomovitz Brian1314,Tobias Dan14,Williams-Brown Yvette15ORCID,Bevers Michael W.2,Liu Jinsong16ORCID,Gornet Terrie G.16,Handy Beverly C.16,Lu Zhen1,Bedia Jacob S.17,Skates Steven J.17ORCID,Bast Robert C.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Experimental Therapeutics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

2. Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

3. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

4. Unity Point Health, John Stoddard Cancer Center, Des Moines, IA

5. Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX

7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Medical School, Oklahoma City, OK

8. Women's Hospital, Houston, TX

9. Deceased

10. Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI

11. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas San Antonio School of Medicine, San Antonio, TX

12. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY

13. Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL

14. Carol G. Simon Cancer Center, Atlantic Health, Morristown, NJ

15. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dell School of Medicine, University of Texas, Austin, TX

16. Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

17. MGH Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

Abstract

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. PURPOSE The Normal Risk Ovarian Screening Study (NROSS) tested a two-stage screening strategy in postmenopausal women at conventional hereditary risk where significantly rising cancer antigen (CA)-125 prompted transvaginal sonography (TVS) and abnormal TVS prompted surgery to detect ovarian cancer. METHODS A total of 7,856 healthy postmenopausal women were screened annually for a total of 50,596 woman-years in a single-arm study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00539162 ). Serum CA125 was analyzed with the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm (ROCA) each year. If risk was unchanged and <1:2,000, women returned in a year. If risk increased above 1:500, TVS was undertaken immediately, and if risk was intermediate, CA125 was repeated in 3 months with a further increase in risk above 1:500 prompting referral for TVS. An average of 2% of participants were referred to TVS annually. RESULTS Thirty-four patients were referred for operations detecting 15 ovarian cancers and two borderline tumors with 12 in early stage (I-II). In addition, seven endometrial cancers were detected with six in stage I. As four ovarian cancers and two borderline tumors were diagnosed with a normal ROCA, the sensitivity for detecting ovarian and borderline cancer was 74% (17 of 23), and 70% of ROCA-detected cases (12 of 17) were in stage I-II. NROSS screening reduced late-stage (III-IV) disease by 34% compared with UKCTOCS controls and by 30% compared with US SEER values. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 50% (17 of 34) for detecting ovarian cancer and 74% (25 of 34) for any cancer, far exceeding the minimum acceptable study end point of 10% PPV. CONCLUSION While the NROSS trial was not powered to detect reduced mortality, the high specificity, PPV, and marked stage shift support further development of this strategy.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3