International Validation of the Immunoscore Biopsy in Patients With Rectal Cancer Managed by a Watch-and-Wait Strategy

Author:

El Sissy Carine1234ORCID,Kirilovsky Amos1234,Lagorce Pagès Christine12345,Marliot Florence1234,Custers Petra A.67,Dizdarevic Edina89,Sroussi Marine1011ORCID,Castillo-Martin Mireia12,Haicheur Nacilla1234,Dermani Mohamed1234,Loche Nicolas1234,Buttard Bénedicte123,Musina Ana Maria1314ORCID,Anitei Maria Gabriela1415ORCID,van den Berg José G.16,Broeks Annegien17ORCID,Iseas Soledad18,Coraglio Mariana18,Loria Fernando Sanchez19ORCID,Romero Alfredo20,Laurent-Puig Pierre2122ORCID,de Reyniès Aurélien2324ORCID,Fernandez Laura M.25,Karoui Mehdi26ORCID,Tougeron David27ORCID,Vaccaro Carlos A.28ORCID,Santino Juan P.28ORCID,Poulsen Laurids Østergaard29,Lindebjerg Jan89,O'Connor Juan Manuel19ORCID,Scripcariu Viorel1415ORCID,Dimofte Mihail-Gabriel1314ORCID,Gérard Jean-Pierre30ORCID,Chalabi Myriam31ORCID,Figueiredo Nuno25ORCID,Perez Rodrigo O.323334ORCID,Habr-Gama Angelita323334,Galon Jérôme123ORCID,Hansen Torben Frøstrup89ORCID,Jensen Lars Henrik89ORCID,Beets Geerard67ORCID,Zeitoun Guy1234,Pagès Franck1234ORCID

Affiliation:

1. INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, Paris, France

2. Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Paris, France

3. Cordeliers Research Center, Sorbonne University, University Paris Cité, Paris, France

4. Immunomonitoring Platform, Laboratory of Immunology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France

5. Department of Pathology, AP-HP, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France

6. Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

7. GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands

8. Department of Oncology, Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark

9. Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

10. Cordeliers Research Center, Sorbonne University, INSERM, University Paris Cité, SIRIC CARPEM, Paris, France

11. Chemistry Biology Innovation Institute, BioChimie Laboratory, ESPCI, UMR8231 CNRS, University PSL, Paris, France

12. Department of Pathology, Fundação Champalimaud, Lisbon, Portugal

13. Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Institute of Oncology (IRO), Iasi, Romania

14. “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania

15. Surgical Oncology Unit, Regional Institute of Oncology, Iasi, Romania

16. Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

17. Core Facility Molecular Pathology and Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

18. Oncology Unit, Gastroenterology Hospital Carlos Bonorino Udaondo, Buenos Aires, Argentina

19. GI Clinical Oncology and GI Surgical Oncology, Instituto Alexander Fleming, Buenos Aires, Argentina

20. Department of Clinical Oncology, British Hospital of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

21. Cordeliers Research Center, Sorbonne University, University Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1138, Paris, France

22. Department of Biology, Cancer Institute Paris CARPEM, AP-HP, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France

23. Cordeliers Research Center, University Paris Cité, INSERM UMRS1138, Paris, France

24. AP-HP, SeqOIA Genomic Medicine Laboratory—IT Platform, Paris, France

25. Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal

26. Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, AP-HP, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France

27. Department of Hepato-Gastro-Enterology and Nutritional Assistance, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France

28. Department of General Surgery, Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina

29. Department of Oncology, Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

30. Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France

31. Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

32. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil

33. Department of Surgical Oncology, Beneficencia Portuguesa Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil

34. Angelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

PURPOSE No biomarker capable of improving selection and monitoring of patients with rectal cancer managed by watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy is currently available. Prognostic performance of the Immunoscore biopsy (ISB) was recently suggested in a preliminary study. METHODS This international validation study included 249 patients with clinical complete response (cCR) managed by W&W strategy. Intratumoral CD3+ and CD8+ T cells were quantified on pretreatment rectal biopsies by digital pathology and converted to ISB. The primary end point was time to recurrence (TTR; the time from the end of neoadjuvant treatment to the date of local regrowth or distant metastasis). Associations between ISB and outcomes were analyzed by stratified Cox regression adjusted for confounders. Immune status of tumor-draining lymph nodes (n = 161) of 17 additional patients treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery was investigated by 3'RNA-Seq and immunofluorescence. RESULTS Recurrence-free rates at 5 years were 91.3% (82.4%-100.0%), 62.5% (53.2%-73.3%), and 53.1% (42.4%-66.5%) with ISB High, ISB Intermediate, and ISB Low, respectively (hazard ratio [HR; Low v High], 6.51; 95% CI, 1.99 to 21.28; log-rank P = .0004). ISB was also significantly associated with disease-free survival (log-rank P = .0002), and predicted both local regrowth and distant metastasis. In multivariate analysis, ISB was independent of patient age, sex, tumor location, cT stage (T, primary tumor; c, clinical), cN stage (N, regional lymph node; c, clinical), and was the strongest predictor for TTR (HR [ISB High v Low], 6.93; 95% CI, 2.08 to 23.15; P = .0017). The addition of ISB to a clinical-based model significantly improved the prediction of recurrence. Finally, B-cell proliferation and memory in draining lymph nodes was evidenced in the draining lymph nodes of patients with cCR. CONCLUSION The ISB is validated as a biomarker to predict both local regrowth and distant metastasis, with a gradual scaling of the risk of pejorative outcome.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Reply to Z. Gao et al;Journal of Clinical Oncology;2024-02-02

2. Immunoscore Biopsy in Patients With Rectal Cancer Managed by a Watch-and-Wait Strategy;Journal of Clinical Oncology;2024-02-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3