Randomized Trial of Hepatic Artery Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Doxorubicin-Eluting Microspheres Compared With Embolization With Microspheres Alone

Author:

Brown Karen T.1,Do Richard K.1,Gonen Mithat1,Covey Anne M.1,Getrajdman George I.1,Sofocleous Constantinos T.1,Jarnagin William R.1,D’Angelica Michael I.1,Allen Peter J.1,Erinjeri Joseph P.1,Brody Lynn A.1,O’Neill Gerald P.1,Johnson Kristian N.1,Garcia Alessandra R.1,Beattie Christopher1,Zhao Binsheng1,Solomon Stephen B.1,Schwartz Lawrence H.1,DeMatteo Ronald1,Abou-Alfa Ghassan K.1

Affiliation:

1. Karen T. Brown, Richard K. Do, Mithat Gonen, Anne M. Covey, George I. Getrajdman, Constantinos T. Sofocleous, William R. Jarnagin, Michael I. D’Angelica, Peter J. Allen, Joseph P. Erinjeri, Lynn A. Brody, Gerald P. O’Neill, Kristian N. Johnson, Alessandra R. Garcia, Christopher Beattie, Stephen B. Solomon, Ronald DeMatteo, and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Binsheng Zhao and Lawrence H. Schwartz, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; and Karen T. Brown,...

Abstract

Purpose Transarterial chemoembolization is accepted therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). No randomized trial has demonstrated superiority of chemoembolization compared with embolization, and the role of chemotherapy remains unclear. This randomized trial compares the outcome of embolization using microspheres alone with chemoembolization using doxorubicin-eluting microspheres. Materials and Methods At a single tertiary referral center, patients with HCC were randomly assigned to embolization with microspheres alone (Bead Block [BB]) or loaded with doxorubicin 150 mg (LC Bead [LCB]). Random assignment was stratified by number of embolizations to complete treatment, and assignments were generated by permuted blocks in the institutional database. The primary end point was response according to RECIST 1.0 (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) using multiphase computed tomography 2 to 3 weeks post-treatment and then at quarterly intervals, with the reviewer blinded to treatment allocation. Secondary objectives included safety and tolerability, time to progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival. This trial is currently closed to accrual. Results Between December 2007 and April 2012, 101 patients were randomly assigned: 51 to BB and 50 to LCB. Demographics were comparable: median age, 67 years; 77% male; and 22% Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A and 78% stage B or C. Adverse events occurred with similar frequency in both groups: BB, 19 of 51 patients (38%); LCB, 20 of 50 patients (40%; P = .48), with no difference in RECIST response: BB, 5.9% versus LCB, 6.0% (difference, −0.1%; 95% CI, −9% to 9%). Median PFS was 6.2 versus 2.8 months (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.91 to 2.05; P = .11), and overall survival, 19.6 versus 20.8 months (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.76; P = .64) for BB and LCB, respectively. Conclusion There was no apparent difference between the treatment arms. These results challenge the use of doxorubicin-eluting beads for chemoembolization of HCC.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 302 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3