Randomized Phase III Postoperative Trial of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Residual Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: ECOG-ACRIN EA1131

Author:

Mayer Ingrid A.1ORCID,Zhao Fengmin2,Arteaga Carlos L.3,Symmans William F.4ORCID,Park Ben H.1ORCID,Burnette Brian L.5,Tevaarwerk Amye J.6ORCID,Garcia Sofia F.7ORCID,Smith Karen L.8ORCID,Makower Della F.9ORCID,Block Margaret10,Morley Kimberly A.11,Jani Chirag R.12,Mescher Craig13,Dewani Shabana J.14,Tawfik Bernard15ORCID,Flaum Lisa E.7,Mayer Erica L.16ORCID,Sikov William M.17ORCID,Rodler Eve T.18ORCID,Wagner Lynne I.19ORCID,DeMichele Angela M.20ORCID,Sparano Joseph A.9ORCID,Wolff Antonio C.8ORCID,Miller Kathy D.21

Affiliation:

1. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN

2. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA

3. UT Southwestern Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX

4. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

5. Cancer Research of Wisconsin and Northern Michigan (CROWN) NCORP, Green Bay, WI

6. University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI

7. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL

8. Johns Hopkins University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD

9. Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY

10. Alegent Health Bergan Mercy Medical Center, Omaha, NE

11. Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI

12. Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Albany, GA

13. Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, St Louis Park, MN

14. Columbus Oncology and Hematology Associates Inc, Columbus, OH

15. University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM

16. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

17. Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI

18. University of California, Davis, Davis, CA

19. Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC

20. University of Pennsylvania/Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

21. Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN

Abstract

PURPOSE Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and residual invasive disease (RD) after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have a high-risk for recurrence, which is reduced by adjuvant capecitabine. Preclinical models support the use of platinum agents in the TNBC basal subtype. The EA1131 trial hypothesized that invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) would not be inferior but improved in patients with basal subtype TNBC treated with adjuvant platinum compared with capecitabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with clinical stage II or III TNBC with ≥ 1 cm RD in the breast post-NAC were randomly assigned to receive platinum (carboplatin or cisplatin) once every 3 weeks for four cycles or capecitabine 14 out of 21 days every 3 weeks for six cycles. TNBC subtype (basal v nonbasal) was determined by PAM50 in the residual disease. A noninferiority design with superiority alternative was chosen, assuming a 4-year iDFS of 67% with capecitabine. RESULTS Four hundred ten of planned 775 participants were randomly assigned to platinum or capecitabine between 2015 and 2021. After median follow-up of 20 months and 120 iDFS events (61% of full information) in the 308 (78%) patients with basal subtype TNBC, the 3-year iDFS for platinum was 42% (95% CI, 30 to 53) versus 49% (95% CI, 39 to 59) for capecitabine. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were more common with platinum agents. The Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended stopping the trial as it was unlikely that further follow-up would show noninferiority or superiority of platinum. CONCLUSION Platinum agents do not improve outcomes in patients with basal subtype TNBC RD post-NAC and are associated with more severe toxicity when compared with capecitabine. Participants had a lower than expected 3-year iDFS regardless of study treatment, highlighting the need for better therapies in this high-risk population.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3