Novel Prognostic Staging System for Patients With De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer

Author:

Plichta Jennifer K.123ORCID,Thomas Samantha M.45,Hayes Daniel F.67ORCID,Chavez-MacGregor Mariana89ORCID,Allison Kimberly10,de los Santos Jennifer11,Fowler Amy M.121314ORCID,Giuliano Armando E.15,Sharma Priyanka16ORCID,Smith Benjamin D.17ORCID,van Eycken Elizabeth18,Edge Stephen B.1920ORCID,Hortobagyi Gabriel N.21ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

2. Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

3. Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC

4. Biostatistics Shared Resource, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC

5. Duke University, Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Durham, NC

6. University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI

7. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

8. Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

9. Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

10. Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

11. Grandview Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Birmingham, AL

12. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI

13. Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI

14. University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI

15. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, University of California—Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

16. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS

17. Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

18. Belgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium

19. Department of Surgical Oncology and Cancer Prevention and Control, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY

20. Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY

21. Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Abstract

PURPOSE Given the heterogeneity and improvement in outcomes for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), we developed a staging system that refines prognostic estimates for patients with metastatic cancer at the time of initial diagnosis, de novo MBC (dnMBC), on the basis of survival outcomes and disease-related variables. METHODS Patients with dnMBC (2010-2016) were selected from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to group patients with similar overall survival (OS) on the basis of clinical T category, grade, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, histology, organ system site of metastases (bone-only, brain-only, visceral), and number of organ systems involved. Three-year OS rates were used to assign a final stage: IVA: >70%, IVB: 50%-70%, IVC: 25 to <50%, and IVD: <25%. Bootstrapping was applied with 1,000 iterations, and final stage assignments were made based on the most commonly occurring assignment. Unadjusted OS was estimated. Validation analyses were conducted using SEER and NCDB. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 52.9 months, the median OS of the original cohort (N = 42,467) was 35.4 months (95% CI, 34.8 to 35.9). RPA stratified patients into 53 groups with 3-year OS rates ranging from 73.5% to 5.7%; these groups were amalgamated into four stage groups: 3-year OS, A = 73.2%, B = 61.9%, C = 40.1%, and D = 17% (log-rank P < .001). After bootstrapping, the survival outcomes for the four stages remained significantly different (log-rank P < .001). This staging system was then validated using SEER data (N = 20,469) and a separate cohort from the NCDB (N = 7,645) (both log-rank P < .001). CONCLUSION Our findings regarding the heterogeneity in outcomes for patients with dnMBC could guide future revisions of the current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging guidelines for patients with newly diagnosed stage IV disease. Our findings should be independently confirmed.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3