Comparison of High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation With Conventional Therapy for Hodgkin's Disease Induction Failure: A Case-Control Study

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the prognostic factors and outcome of first-line induction failure Hodgkin's disease patients who were treated with a salvage regimen of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation, and to compare them with matched, conventionally treated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data relating to 86 Hodgkin's disease patients who underwent autologous stem-cell transplantation after failure of the first chemotherapy regimen, either because they did not enter a complete remission and experienced progression of disease less than 3 months after the end of their first-line treatment or because they showed evidence of disease progression during first-line therapy. Graft patients were matched with 258 conventionally treated patients (three controls per case) for age, sex, clinical stage, B symptoms, and time at risk; patient data were obtained from international databases. RESULTS: Among the 86 graft patients, the median age at diagnosis was 29 years (range, 14 to 57 years). Thirty-nine percent of patients had stage II disease, 23% had stage III disease, and 38% had stage IV disease. Seventy percent of the patients received chemotherapy and 30% received combined modality therapy; 60% of the patients received a seven- or eight-drug regimen. After this first-line treatment, 91% had disease progression and 9% had a brief partial response. Eighty patients received a second-line treatment; pretransplantation status was as follows: 24% of patients had a complete remission, 38% had a partial remission (PR), 14% had stable disease, and disease progression occurred in 24%. With a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 4 to 105 months) from diagnosis, the 5-year event-free survival and overall survival rates from transplantation were 25% and 35% (95% confidence intervals, 15 to 36 and 23 to 49), respectively. In multivariate analysis, the pretransplantation disease status after salvage therapy was the only significant prognostic factor for survival (PR: relative risk = 2.8, P = .017; progressive disease: relative risk (RR) = 5.26, P < .001). From diagnosis, the 6-year overall survival rates of the graft patients and 258 matched conventionally treated patients were 38% and 29%, respectively (P = .058). CONCLUSION: Autologous stem-cell transplantation represents the best therapeutic option currently available for patients with primary induction failure and is associated with acceptable toxicity. Response to second-line treatment before high-dose chemotherapy is the only prognostic factor that can be correlated with survival.