“Too posh to push?” Self-stigmatization in childbirth

Author:

Hoffmann LisaORCID,Berner ElisaORCID,Hilger NorbertORCID

Abstract

Self-stigmatization after intervention-rich births (e.g., via C-section) is an anecdotally well-documented phenomenon. The aim of the present paper was to address this issue empirically. In doing so, we assessed 1,743 mothers who had required medical interventions to give birth and developed a psychometrically sound questionnaire—the Labor and Birth Self-Stigmatization Scale (LBS)—to measure birth-related self-stigmatization. We tested and confirmed the hypothesis that birth-related self-stigmatization was associated with a more negative birth experience, explaining incremental validity over, e.g., neuroticism and self-esteem. Results further revealed that the strongest, but not the only, predictor of self-stigmatization was having a C-section. Participants’ birth-related mindset moderated the negative correlation between self-stigmatization and birth experience, with a more natural mindset strengthening the negative association. The results of the present study illustrate the close association of birth and psychological factors and highlight the importance of studying and understanding self-stigmatization after childbirth.

Publisher

Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID)

Reference51 articles.

1. Azoulay, I. (2003). Geburtshilfe und Selbstbestimmung [Obstetrics and self-determination]. In B. A. Schücking (Ed.), Selbstbestimmung der Frau in Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe [Self-determination of women in gynecology and obstetrics] (pp. 37–45). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

2. The birth experience and women's postnatal depression: A systematic review

3. Too Posh To Push? Comparative perspectives on maternal request caesarean sections in Canada, the US, the UK and Finland

4. How Firm Are the Foundations of Mind-Set Theory? The Claims Appear Stronger Than the Evidence

5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0731/88012110-d.html

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3