Terminological variation and conceptual divergence in EU Law

Author:

Bajčić Martina1

Affiliation:

1. University of Rijeka

Abstract

Both terminological variation and conceptual divergence can undermine the uniform application and interpretation of EU law. However, even if terminological convergence is upheld, conceptual divergence can nevertheless be manifested in varying interpretations of EU concepts at the level of the Member States. Highlighting the distinction between terminological variation and conceptual divergence, the present chapter puts the focus of attention on the European standard of the right of withdrawal. By means of a corpus-informed and legal analysis of the terms used for the latter concept in several EU languages attempt is made to explain the multiple dimensions of EU terms, namely the phenomena of term variation and meaning modulations. It is proposed to expand the context of studying variants in EU law in regard to conceptual divergence and legal design.

Publisher

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Reference40 articles.

1. Legal Integration and Language Diversity

2. New Insights into the Semantics of Legal Concepts and the Legal Dictionary

3. The Role of EU Legal English in Shaping EU Legal Culture;Bajčić;International Journal of Law and Language JLL,2018

4. Anregungen zum Umdenken in der EU-Rechtsterminologie [Rethinking EU Legal Terminology];Bajčić,2021

5. Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making: A Debunking Exercise

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3