Abstract
Abstract
Turkish 3rd person plural subjects normally appear with verbs that are unmarked for number. Following earlier
findings which indicate that Turkish heritage speakers (HS) accept overt plural marking more readily compared to monolingually
raised Turkish speakers, the present study investigates to what extent bilingual speakers are sensitive to grammatical,
surface-level and semantic constraints on Turkish plural agreement marking. A scalar acceptability judgement task was carried out
with non-bilingual Turkish speakers residing in Turkey and Turkish-German bilinguals residing in Germany. Our experimental design
involved manipulating both subject animacy and subject position. Participants’ judgement patterns confirmed Turkish speakers’
general preference for unmarked verb forms, which was modulated both by subject animacy and by subject position. Significant
differences were observed between lower proficiency HS on the one hand, and monolinguals and advanced proficiency HS on the other,
suggesting that the relatively subtle interplay between different types of constraint on number agreement marking is affected by
heritage language conditions. We found no evidence for simplification or optionality reduction in the lower proficiency HS’
judgements, however. We innovate on previous research by using Gradient Symbolic Computation modelling to capture between-group
differences in the relative weightings of the constraints under investigation.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献