Affiliation:
1. University of Edinburgh
Abstract
Abstract
This paper proposes that modal constructions can develop into conditional constructions in Mandarin Chinese and vice versa. Therefore, bidirectionality exists between these kinds of constructions diachronically. While bidirectionality is an apparent violation of unidirectionality, both directions of change are shown to be regular cases of procedural constructionalization, enabled by the fact that modal and conditional constructions can perform identical indirect speech acts (i.e., they are performatively equivalent) and instances of one may be morphosyntactically categorized as the other in Chinese (i.e., they are morphosyntactically vague). A crosslinguistically generalizable prediction is then proposed: bidirectionality is possible if instances of two constructions are performatively equivalent and morphosyntactically vague with respect to each other in certain contexts.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference88 articles.
1. Japanese Modals are Conditionals
2. Conditionality and deontic modality in Japanese and Korean;Akatsuka,1993
3. Modality’s semantic map;Auwera;Linguistic Typology,1998
4. The myth of the complete sentence – a response to Traugott
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Revisiting Modality;Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics;2024-03-23
2. Bidirectional grammaticalization: Chinese modal and conditional;Journal of Linguistics;2023-03-02
3. From deontic modality to conditionality;Journal of Historical Pragmatics;2022-09-26