Antimony centre in three different roles: does donor strength or acceptor ability determine the bonding pattern?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Antimony centre in three different roles: does donor strength or acceptor ability determine the bonding pattern?

Published:2024 Issue:43 Volume:53 Page:17721-17726
ISSN:1477-9226
Container-title:Dalton Transactions
language:en
Short-container-title:Dalton Trans.

Author:

Chlebík Richard¹,Fekete Csilla²^ORCID,Jambor Roman¹^ORCID,Růžička Aleš¹^ORCID,Benkő Zoltán²³^ORCID,Dostál Libor¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of General and Inorganic Chemistry, University of Pardubice, Studentská 573, CZ 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic

2. Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem rkp 3, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary

3. HUN-REN-BME Computation Driven Chemistry Research Group, Műegyetem rkp 3, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary

Abstract

The guanidine substituted organostibines allowed remarkable coordination variability including three distinct modes of M⋯Sb bonding (M = Pd or Pt), i.e. Sb → M L-type and Z-type interactions involving M ← Sb donation and M → Sb backdonation.

Funder

Grantová Agentura České Republiky

Publisher

Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Link

http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/DT/D4DT02787F

Reference76 articles.

1. Developments in the chemistry of stibine and bismuthine complexes

2. Neutral organoantimony(III) and organobismuth(III) ligands as acceptors in transition metal complexes – Role of substituents and co-ligands

3. Developments in the coordination chemistry of stibine ligands

4. Coordination chemistry of stibine and bismuthine ligands

5. Trialkylstibanes as Bridging Ligands: Synthesis and Structure of the Dinuclear Complexes [Rh₂Cl₂(μ‐SbiPr₃)(μ‐CR₂)₂]