Author:
Siskos Evangelos,Darvidou Konstantia,Ostapenko Viktoriia
Abstract
Ukraine’s entry into the path of innovative economic development requires modernisation of the interaction between stakeholders of education, science and business to create a network of cooperation, taking into account the needs of stakeholders due to the situation in Ukraine as of 2023, focusing on changes in the world economy. The purpose of the article was to build a structural and logical scheme of analytical support for identifying trends and problems in the development of interaction between stakeholders in education, science and business. The methodology was based on the use of logical, systemic and comparative analysis. The analysis of budgetary funding for priority areas of innovation activity and sales of innovative products (services) and new technologies by budgetary funds managers showed no trends and priorities for the development of technology transfer and other intellectual property rights carried out by universities, research institutions, enterprises and organisations. The generalisation of changes and prospects of legislative regulation of support for educational, innovative, scientific and technical activities of business focuses on post-war reconstruction, which involves increasing confidence in the educational, scientific and expert activities of institutions for their effective functioning and increasing the volume of research funding. The analysis of the integration aspects of the research and innovation system into the European Research Area and support from international scientific organisations and foreign governments proved the support received from many national scientific communities and international scientific organisations in the creation of the portal for international scientific and technical cooperation and the international consortium for infrastructure and research. The practical significance of the study lies in the proposed directions for improving interaction with business of educational and scientific institutions in the process of implementing innovations separately by stages of interaction with stakeholders (attraction, financing and implementation)
Publisher
Scientific Journals Publishing House
Reference38 articles.
1. [1] Blind, K., & Heß, P. (2023). Stakeholder perceptions of the role of standards for addressing the sustainable development goals. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 37, 180-190. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2023.02.016.
2. [2] Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 892-р “National Open Science Plan”. (2022, October). Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/nauka/2023/01/26/National-Open-Science-Plan-Ukraine.pdf.
3. [3] Du, S., Bstieler, L., & Yalcinkaya, G. (2022). Sustainability-focused innovation in the business-to-business context: Antecedents and managerial implications. Journal of Business Research, 138, 117-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.006.
4. [4] Education 4.0: Ukrainian sunrise. (2022). Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/news/2022/12/10/Osvita-4.0.ukrayinskyy.svitanok.pdf.
5. [5] Engez, A., & Aarikka-Stenroos, L. (2023). Stakeholder contributions to commercialization and market creation of a radical innovation: Bridging the micro- and macro levels. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 38(13), 31-44. doi: 10.1108/JBIM-03-2022-0136.