Author:
Clark Esther,Vedam Saraswathi,Mclean Alison,Stoll Kathrin,Lo Winnie,Hall Wendy A.
Abstract
Background and Purpose:Consistent measurement of respectful maternity care (RMC) is lacking. This Delphi study assessed consensus about indicators of RMC.Methods:A multidisciplinary panel assessed items (n= 201) drawn from global literature. Over two rounds, the panel rated importance, relevance, and clarity, and ranked priority within 17 domains including communication, autonomy, support, stigma, discrimination, and mistreatment. Qualitative feedback supported the analysis.Results:In Round One, 191 indicators exceeded a content validation index of 0.80. In Round Two, Kendall’sWranged from 0.081 (p= .209) to 0.425 (p< .001) across domains. Fourteen indicators received strong support. Changes in indicator assessment between rounds prevented agreement stability assessment.Conclusion:The indicators comprise a registry of items for use in perinatal care research.
Publisher
Springer Publishing Company
Subject
General Medicine,General Nursing
Reference75 articles.
1. A test of the form-resistant correlation hypothesis: Ratings, rankings, and the measurement of values;The Public Opinion Quarterly,1988
2. Birth trauma: In the eye of the beholder;Nursing Research,2004
3. Transforming intrapartum care: Respectful maternity care;Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology,2020
4. Bohren, M. A. , Vogel, J. P. , Fawole, B. , Maya, E. T. , Maung, T. M. , Baldé, M. D. , & Tunçalp, Ö. (2018). Methodological development of tools to measure how women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: Labor observation and community survey. BMC Medical Research Methodology , 18(1), N.PAG-N.PAG. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0603-x
5. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: A mixed-methods systematic review;PLoS Medicine,2015
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献