Abstract
AbstractClimate protests are an important driver for ambitious climate policies. However, it is still unknown how individual protest participation decisions depend on each other. Exploiting the unique opportunity of the Third Global Climate Strike, we conducted multi-wave population surveys with 1,510 people in the four largest German cities. With a randomized information intervention, we changed turnout expectations of a subgroup of respondents and measured the impact on the probability to join the local protest event. Our findings provide causal evidence for strategic interdependence in protest participation decisions among members of the general public rather than among a movement’s core group of supporters. These decisions are found to be strategic substitutes: individuals who expect many other people to participate are less likely to participate themselves. This dynamic has important implications for the movement’s future communication and growth perspective.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Helmholtz Association
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
Reference42 articles.
1. Tilly, C. From Mobilization to Revolution (Addison–Wesley, 1978).
2. Acemoglu, D. & Robinson, J. A. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006).
3. Markoff, J. Waves of Democracy: Social Movements and Political Change 2nd edn (Routledge, 2014).
4. Chase-Dunn, C. & Almeida, P. D. Global Struggles and Social Change (Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 2020).
5. Biggs, M. Strikes as forest fires: Chicago and Paris in the late nineteenth century. Am. J. Sociol. 110, 1684–1714 (2005).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Climate Activism;Encyclopedia of Law and Economics;2024