Testing quantum electrodynamics in extreme fields using helium-like uranium
Author:
Loetzsch R.ORCID, Beyer H. F., Duval L.ORCID, Spillmann U., Banaś D.ORCID, Dergham P., Kröger F. M.ORCID, Glorius J., Grisenti R. E.ORCID, Guerra M.ORCID, Gumberidze A.ORCID, Heß R., Hillenbrand P.-M.ORCID, Indelicato P.ORCID, Jagodzinski P., Lamour E., Lorentz B., Litvinov S., Litvinov Yu. A.ORCID, Machado J.ORCID, Paul N., Paulus G. G.ORCID, Petridis N.ORCID, Santos J. P.ORCID, Scheidel M., Sidhu R. S.ORCID, Steck M., Steydli S., Szary K., Trotsenko S., Uschmann I., Weber G., Stöhlker Th., Trassinelli M.ORCID
Abstract
AbstractQuantum electrodynamics (QED), the quantum field theory that describes the interaction between light and matter, is commonly regarded as the best-tested quantum theory in modern physics. However, this claim is mostly based on extremely precise studies performed in the domain of relatively low field strengths and light atoms and ions1–6. In the realm of very strong electromagnetic fields such as in the heaviest highly charged ions (with nuclear charge Z ≫ 1), QED calculations enter a qualitatively different, non-perturbative regime. Yet, the corresponding experimental studies are very challenging, and theoretical predictions are only partially tested. Here we present an experiment sensitive to higher-order QED effects and electron–electron interactions in the high-Z regime. This is achieved by using a multi-reference method based on Doppler-tuned X-ray emission from stored relativistic uranium ions with different charge states. The energy of the 1s1/22p3/2 J = 2 → 1s1/22s1/2 J = 1 intrashell transition in the heaviest two-electron ion (U90+) is obtained with an accuracy of 37 ppm. Furthermore, a comparison of uranium ions with different numbers of bound electrons enables us to disentangle and to test separately the one-electron higher-order QED effects and the bound electron–electron interaction terms without the uncertainty related to the nuclear radius. Moreover, our experimental result can discriminate between several state-of-the-art theoretical approaches and provides an important benchmark for calculations in the strong-field domain.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference79 articles.
1. Sailer, T. et al. Measurement of the bound-electron g-factor difference in coupled ions. Nature 606, 479–483 (2022). 2. Hanneke, D., Fogwell, S. & Gabrielse, G. New measurement of the electron magnetic moment and the fine structure constant. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 120801 (2008). 3. Aoyama, T., Hayakawa, M., Kinoshita, T. & Nio, M. Tenth-order QED contribution to the electron g − 2 and an improved value of the fine structure constant. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 111807 (2012). 4. Morel, L., Yao, Z., Cladé, P. & Guellati-Khélifa, S. Determination of the fine-structure constant with an accuracy of 81 parts per trillion. Nature 588, 61–65 (2020). 5. Biesheuvel, J. et al. Probing QED and fundamental constants through laser spectroscopy of vibrational transitions in HD+. Nat. Commun. 7, 10385 (2016).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|