Large-scale plasma proteomics comparisons through genetics and disease associations

Author:

Eldjarn Grimur HjorleifssonORCID,Ferkingstad EgilORCID,Lund Sigrun H.ORCID,Helgason Hannes,Magnusson Olafur Th.,Gunnarsdottir Kristbjorg,Olafsdottir Thorunn A.ORCID,Halldorsson Bjarni V.ORCID,Olason Pall I.,Zink Florian,Gudjonsson Sigurjon A.,Sveinbjornsson GardarORCID,Magnusson Magnus I.,Helgason AgnarORCID,Oddsson AsmundurORCID,Halldorsson Gisli H.ORCID,Magnusson Magnus K.ORCID,Saevarsdottir SaedisORCID,Eiriksdottir ThjodbjorgORCID,Masson Gisli,Stefansson Hreinn,Jonsdottir IngileifORCID,Holm HilmaORCID,Rafnar ThorunnORCID,Melsted Pall,Saemundsdottir Jona,Norddahl Gudmundur L.,Thorleifsson GudmarORCID,Ulfarsson Magnus O.,Gudbjartsson Daniel F.ORCID,Thorsteinsdottir Unnur,Sulem PatrickORCID,Stefansson KariORCID

Abstract

AbstractHigh-throughput proteomics platforms measuring thousands of proteins in plasma combined with genomic and phenotypic information have the power to bridge the gap between the genome and diseases. Here we performed association studies of Olink Explore 3072 data generated by the UK Biobank Pharma Proteomics Project1 on plasma samples from more than 50,000 UK Biobank participants with phenotypic and genotypic data, stratifying on British or Irish, African and South Asian ancestries. We compared the results with those of a SomaScan v4 study on plasma from 36,000 Icelandic people2, for 1,514 of whom Olink data were also available. We found modest correlation between the two platforms. Although cis protein quantitative trait loci were detected for a similar absolute number of assays on the two platforms (2,101 on Olink versus 2,120 on SomaScan), the proportion of assays with such supporting evidence for assay performance was higher on the Olink platform (72% versus 43%). A considerable number of proteins had genomic associations that differed between the platforms. We provide examples where differences between platforms may influence conclusions drawn from the integration of protein levels with the study of diseases. We demonstrate how leveraging the diverse ancestries of participants in the UK Biobank helps to detect novel associations and refine genomic location. Our results show the value of the information provided by the two most commonly used high-throughput proteomics platforms and demonstrate the differences between them that at times provides useful complementarity.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3