Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference5 articles.
1. Arias-Stella JA 3rd, Shah AB, Montoya-Cerrillo D, Williamson SR, Gupta NS (2015) Prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score correlation in heterogenous tumors: proposal for a composite Gleason score. Am J Surg Pathol 39: 1213–1218.
2. Berney DM, Beltran L, Fisher G, North BV, Greenberg D, Moller H, Soosay G, Scardino P, Cuzick J (2016) Validation of a contemporary prostate cancer grading system using prostate cancer death as outcome. Br Jnl Cancer In press.
3. Epstein JI, Zelefsky MJ, Sjoberg DD, Nelson JB, Magi-Galluzzi C, Vickers AJ, Parwani VE, Fine SW, Eastham JA, Wiklund P, Han M, Reddy CA, Ciezki JP, Nyberg T, Klein EA (2016a) A contemporary prostate cancer grading system: a validated alternative to Gleason score. Eur Urol 69: 428–435.
4. Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA Grading committee (2016b) The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system. Am J Surg Pathol 40: 244–252.
5. Pierorazio PM, Walsh PC, Partin AW, Epstein JI (2013) Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system. BJU Int 111: 753–760.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献