The Medical Segmentation Decathlon
-
Published:2022-07-15
Issue:1
Volume:13
Page:
-
ISSN:2041-1723
-
Container-title:Nature Communications
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat Commun
Author:
Antonelli MichelaORCID, Reinke AnnikaORCID, Bakas SpyridonORCID, Farahani Keyvan, Kopp-Schneider AnnetteORCID, Landman Bennett A.ORCID, Litjens GeertORCID, Menze BjoernORCID, Ronneberger Olaf, Summers Ronald M., van Ginneken Bram, Bilello Michel, Bilic Patrick, Christ Patrick F., Do Richard K. G.ORCID, Gollub Marc J., Heckers Stephan H., Huisman HenkjanORCID, Jarnagin William R., McHugo Maureen K., Napel SandyORCID, Pernicka Jennifer S. GoliaORCID, Rhode Kawal, Tobon-Gomez Catalina, Vorontsov Eugene, Meakin James A., Ourselin Sebastien, Wiesenfarth Manuel, Arbeláez Pablo, Bae ByeongukORCID, Chen Sihong, Daza Laura, Feng JianjiangORCID, He Baochun, Isensee Fabian, Ji Yuanfeng, Jia FucangORCID, Kim Ildoo, Maier-Hein KlausORCID, Merhof DoritORCID, Pai Akshay, Park Beomhee, Perslev MathiasORCID, Rezaiifar Ramin, Rippel Oliver, Sarasua Ignacio, Shen Wei, Son Jaemin, Wachinger Christian, Wang Liansheng, Wang Yan, Xia Yingda, Xu Daguang, Xu ZhanweiORCID, Zheng YefengORCID, Simpson Amber L., Maier-Hein Lena, Cardoso M. JorgeORCID
Abstract
AbstractInternational challenges have become the de facto standard for comparative assessment of image analysis algorithms. Although segmentation is the most widely investigated medical image processing task, the various challenges have been organized to focus only on specific clinical tasks. We organized the Medical Segmentation Decathlon (MSD)—a biomedical image analysis challenge, in which algorithms compete in a multitude of both tasks and modalities to investigate the hypothesis that a method capable of performing well on multiple tasks will generalize well to a previously unseen task and potentially outperform a custom-designed solution. MSD results confirmed this hypothesis, moreover, MSD winner continued generalizing well to a wide range of other clinical problems for the next two years. Three main conclusions can be drawn from this study: (1) state-of-the-art image segmentation algorithms generalize well when retrained on unseen tasks; (2) consistent algorithmic performance across multiple tasks is a strong surrogate of algorithmic generalizability; (3) the training of accurate AI segmentation models is now commoditized to scientists that are not versed in AI model training.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Chemistry,Multidisciplinary
Reference45 articles.
1. Litjens, G. et al. Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–11 (2016). 2. Poplin, R. et al. Prediction of cardiovascular risk factors from retinal fundus photographs via deep learning. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 158–164 (2018). 3. Stokes, J. M. et al. A deep learning approach to antibiotic discovery. Cell 180, 688–702 (2020). 4. Ayache, N. & Duncan, J. 20th anniversary of the medical image analysis journal (media). Med. Image Anal. 33, 1–3 (2016). 5. Liang, S. et al. Deep-learning-based detection and segmentation of organs at risk in nasopharyngeal carcinoma computed tomographic images for radiotherapy planning. Eur. Radiol. 29, 1961–1967 (2019).
Cited by
391 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|