Abstract
AbstractOur article aims to provide a comprehensive portrayal of how seven Asian jurisdictions have sought to address the challenge of genetic discrimination (GD) by presenting an analysis of the relevant legislation, policies, and practices. Based on our findings, policy discussion and action on preventing or mitigating GD have been narrowly framed in terms of employment, insurance, disability, marriage, and family planning. Except for South Korea, none of the jurisdictions we examined has adopted specific legislation to prevent GD. However, for Asia to truly benefit from its recent scientific and technological progress in genomics, we highlight the need for these jurisdictions to engage more proactively with the challenges of GD through a coordinated regulatory and governance mechanism.
Funder
PERSPECTIVE II project, funded by Genome Canada/Genome Quebec
National Research Foundation of Korea
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics (clinical),Genetics,Molecular Biology
Reference86 articles.
1. Kim, Y. & Han, B. G., the KoGES group. Cohort Profile: the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) Consortium. Int. J. Epidemiol. 46, 1350 (2017).
2. Nagai, A. et al. Overview of the BioBank Japan Project: study design and profile. J. Epidemiol. 27(Suppl.), S2–S8 (2017).
3. Taiwan. National Biobank Consortium of Taiwan. https://nbct.nhri.org.tw/en/index.php (2021).
4. The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Government announces appointments to Hong Kong Genome Institute. https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/202011/05/P2020110500465.htm (2020).
5. Billings, P. R. et al. Discrimination as a consequence of genetic testing. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 50, 476–482 (1992).
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献