Author:
Johnson Brian J.,Weber Michael,Al-Amin Hasan Mohammad,Geier Martin,Devine Gregor J.
Abstract
AbstractGreat advances in automated identification systems, or ‘smart traps’, that differentiate insect species have been made in recent years, yet demonstrations of field-ready devices under free-flight conditions remain rare. Here, we describe the results of mixed-species identification of female mosquitoes using an advanced optoacoustic smart trap design under free-flying conditions. Point-of-capture classification was assessed using mixed populations of congeneric (Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti) and non-congeneric (Ae. aegypti and Anopheles stephensi) container-inhabiting species of medical importance. Culex quinquefasciatus, also common in container habitats, was included as a third species in all assessments. At the aggregate level, mixed collections of non-congeneric species (Ae. aegypti, Cx. quinquefasciatus, and An. stephensi) could be classified at accuracies exceeding 90% (% error = 3.7–7.1%). Conversely, error rates increased when analysing individual replicates (mean % error = 48.6; 95% CI 8.1–68.6) representative of daily trap captures and at the aggregate level when Ae. albopictus was released in the presence of Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus (% error = 7.8–31.2%). These findings highlight the many challenges yet to be overcome but also the potential operational utility of optoacoustic surveillance in low diversity settings typical of urban environments.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference81 articles.
1. Moise, I., Zulu, L., Fuller, D. & Beier, J. Persistent barriers to implementing efficacious mosquito control activities in the continental United States: Insights from vector control experts. In Current Topics in Neglected Tropical Diseases (ed. Rodriguez-Morales, A.) (IntechOpen, 2018).
2. Akogbéto, M. C. et al. Six years of experience in entomological surveillance of indoor residual spraying against malaria transmission in Benin: Lessons learned, challenges and outlooks. Malaria J. 14, 1–12 (2015).
3. Potamitis, I., Eliopoulos, P. & Rigakis, I. Automated remote insect surveillance at a global scale and the internet of things. Robotics 6, 19 (2017).
4. Kim, D., DeBriere, T. J., Cherukumalli, S., White, G. S. & Burkett-Cadena, N. D. Infrared light sensors permit rapid recording of wingbeat frequency and bioacoustic species identification of mosquitoes. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–9 (2021).
5. Rydhmer, K. et al. Automating insect monitoring using unsupervised near-infrared sensors. Sci. Rep. 12, 1–11 (2022).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Towards global insect biomonitoring with frugal methods;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences;2024-05-06